How AI Search Is Recommending Greens and Superfood Supplements: Monthly Trends

Executive Summary

AG1 remains the category leader in October 2026 with 79.0% valid recommendation coverage, extending its gap over the next brand to 30.2 points ahead of Amazing Grass at 48.8%. That lead widened over the series from 75.4% in July 2026, a 3.6-point gain that falls inside normal month-to-month variation. AG1 also improved its rank-one rate from 57.3% in July 2026 to 65.5% in October 2026, an 8.2-point gain that stands out as the leader's largest placement shift across the series.

Organifi is the sharpest upward mover in October 2026, rising to 18.6% coverage from 4.8% in July 2026, a significant 13.8-point gain. That is a third consecutive month of increases, with coverage climbing from 4.8% in July 2026 to 10.0% in August 2026 to 16.9% in September 2026 to 18.6% in October 2026. The month-to-month gain from September to October was 1.7 points, a slower pace than the brand's 6.9-point jump between August and September.

Bloom Nutrition is the sharpest decliner against baseline, falling from 54.2% in July 2026 to 41.3% in October 2026, a significant 12.9-point drop. Live it Up also declined significantly over the same window, from 52.3% to 39.7% coverage, a 12.6-point fall. Both brands registered small upward moves from September to October, of 2.2 points and 0.3 points respectively, but neither recovered the ground lost earlier in the series.

Against the prior month, October 2026 showed no significant brand-level movement from September 2026, in a category the benchmark classifies as mixed. The October reading sits within a series trending toward fewer qualified observations, from 354 in July 2026 to 252 in October 2026.

The public brand-level metrics in this report are based on 252 qualified observations in October 2026, compared with 354 qualified observations in July 2026, drawn from the benchmark's defined AI/search surface universe.

Key Findings

AI Response Inconsistency Alerts

Questions This Section Answers

• Which AI platforms and brands were flagged for conflicting claims this month?
• Where did the most serious conflicts occur around pricing, availability, and ingredient disclosure?

The benchmark's conflict monitoring detected 7 critical or high severity factual inconsistencies across 5 AI platforms: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Three companies were involved.

Live it Up

Four high or critical inconsistencies were detected for Live it Up across ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, and AI Overviews.

A critical availability conflict was detected between ChatGPT and Gemini. When asked "What are the best super greens to buy?", ChatGPT stated that the FDA warned against certain expiration-date lots in January 2026 after they were linked to a multistate Salmonella outbreak, and advised avoiding the product unless the lot could be verified as unaffected. Gemini recommended the same product as a top-rated "All-Around Value & Digestion" pick with no mention of any safety issue or recall. ChatGPT cited ConsumerLab, Forbes Health, and Get Evident; Gemini cited Wolfa and Olive Magazine.

A high severity pricing conflict was detected between ChatGPT and AI Overviews. When asked "Is Live It Up Supergreens worth it?", ChatGPT stated the product costs around $2 per serving, while AI Overviews stated around $1.33 per serving. ChatGPT cited BarBend and EatingWell; AI Overviews cited letsliveitup.com, Top Nutrition Coaching, and a Live It Up versus AG1 comparison review.

A high severity factual conflict on ingredient disclosure was detected between AI Mode and AI Overviews. When asked "Is Live It Up Super greens worth it?", AI Mode stated the product avoids hidden proprietary blends by disclosing exact amounts for many components, while AI Overviews stated it uses proprietary blends and that exact amounts of individual ingredients are not fully disclosed. AI Mode cited Garage Gym Reviews, Top Nutrition Coaching, and The Advocate; AI Overviews cited letsliveitup.com, Garage Gym Reviews, and The Quality Edit.

A high severity pricing conflict on pouch cost was detected between AI Overviews and AI Mode. When asked "What is the best alternative to AG1?", AI Overviews stated the product costs roughly $39.99 for a 30-serving pouch with a subscription, while AI Mode stated $59.99. Both responses cited Top Nutrition Coaching, and a flagged source at The Quality Edit was recorded as displaying both price points on the same page.

AG1

Two high severity inconsistencies were detected for AG1 across Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, and AI Overviews.

A high severity pricing conflict was detected between AI Mode and Copilot. When asked "What is the best green drink powder?", AI Mode stated AG1 costs $24.99, while Copilot stated approximately $99 per month. AI Mode cited Fortune and Ringly.io; Copilot cited Wired, Bon Appetit, and Forbes. A flagged source at Wired was recorded as listing a $99 price point.

A high severity factual conflict on organic certification was detected between AI Overviews and Gemini. When asked "What is the best organic green superfood powder?", AI Overviews listed AG1 Next Gen under "Top Organic Green Powders by Category" as "Best Comprehensive Formula", while Gemini stated AG1 Next Gen is "not fully organic". AI Overviews cited Garden of Life, Forbes Vetted, and Verywell Fit; Gemini cited Vibrant Health, Top Nutrition Coaching, and Wolfa.

Bloom Nutrition

One high severity inconsistency was detected for Bloom Nutrition on Copilot.

A high severity pricing conflict was detected within Copilot responses to the same question. When asked "Is Bloom Super greens actually good for you?", one Copilot response stated Bloom Greens Mango (169g) costs $129, while another stated Bloom Greens Powder (Mango) costs $21.97. Sources on both sides drew from ScienceInsights, VNutrition and Wellness, and Good Housekeeping review pages.

Benchmark Context

Questions This Section Answers

• How many qualified observations and surface families anchor the October 2026 percentages?
• How did the qualified benchmark denominator and recommendation-shaped answer share change from July to October 2026?

Brand-level recommendation percentages in this report are calculated within the qualified benchmark set for each month.

These qualified counts anchor every brand-level percentage in this report. The metrics below summarize how the category behaved in aggregate across the same period, before the brand-by-brand breakdown that follows.

Benchmark-Level Metrics

The qualified observation count moved unevenly across the series: 354 in July 2026, 321 in August 2026, 325 in September 2026, and 252 in October 2026. The October reading is the smallest qualified set in the series, and the recommendation-shaped answer share reached its series high in October 2026.

AI Recommendation Trend

Questions This Section Answers

• Which greens and superfood brands gained or lost recommendation coverage between July and October 2026?
• Did any brand's September-to-October movement exceed normal month-to-month variation?

Both the top and the middle of the category were broadly stable from September to October, with positive three-month movements for AG1 and Organifi set against sustained declines for Bloom Nutrition and Live it Up.

The table below compares each tracked brand's valid recommendation coverage in the baseline month against the current month, with the October rank shown alongside.

No brand exceeded normal month-to-month variation against September 2026. The category-level change visible across the series came from the combination of several smaller movements, with Organifi's sustained three-month rise and the sustained declines of Bloom Nutrition and Live it Up carrying the largest effects.

What Changed This Month

Questions This Section Answers

• Why is AG1's rank-one gain a sharper signal than its overall coverage change?
• What does Organifi's slowing three-month rise say about its position versus the declining brands?
• Which brands saw the steepest placement losses relative to their July 2026 baseline?

AG1: Leader extends its gap on a rank-one gain

AG1's valid recommendation coverage moved from 75.4% in July 2026 to 79.0% in October 2026, a 3.6-point gain that did not exceed the significance threshold. The same 3.6-point gain applied against September 2026, when coverage was 75.4%. Coverage across the series read 75.4% in July 2026, 69.8% in August 2026, 75.4% in September 2026, and 79.0% in October 2026.

The sharper signal is placement. AG1's recommended rank-one rate rose from 57.3% in July 2026 to 65.5% in October 2026, an 8.2-point gain. Its recommended top-three rate rose from 70.6% to 76.6% over the same window, and raw presence rose from 87.8% to 91.3%. AG1 held 199 valid recommendations in October 2026 and 230 present mentions.

The distinction is between a leader whose overall coverage is stable and whose first-place share is materially stronger than it was in July 2026. The gap to the second-ranked brand widened from 19.8 points in July 2026 to 30.2 points in October 2026.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which high-intent prompts produce the first-place placements behind the rank-one gain, and which brands take the recommendation when AG1 is not first?

Organifi: Three-month riser with a slowing monthly pace

Organifi's valid recommendation coverage climbed from 4.8% in July 2026 to 10.0% in August 2026, 16.9% in September 2026, and 18.6% in October 2026. The full series move of 13.8 points is significant. The month-to-month move from September to October was 1.7 points, notably smaller than the 6.9-point jump between August and September.

Raw presence rose from 5.9% of July 2026 qualified observations to 21.8% in October 2026, a 15.9-point gain. The recommended top-three rate rose from 1.1% to 6.3%, reaching 16 of October 2026's qualified observations. Organifi held 47 valid recommendations in October 2026. Its rank-one rate was 0.8% in October 2026 against 0.6% in July 2026.

The distinction is between a brand that has steadily improved its presence and top-three placement and its persistent thinness at the first-choice position. Organifi's rise is the mirror image of the declines recorded for Bloom Nutrition and Live it Up against the same baseline: the gap between Live it Up and Organifi narrowed every month of the series, from 47.5 points in July 2026 to 21.1 points in October 2026.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompts are now surfacing Organifi that did not in July 2026, and which brands are losing those placements?

Bloom Nutrition: Significant decliner with partial October recovery

Bloom Nutrition's valid recommendation coverage fell from 54.2% in July 2026 to 41.3% in October 2026, a significant 12.9-point decline. The month-to-month move from September to October was a 2.2-point gain, following a series low of 39.1% in September 2026. Coverage across the series read 54.2% in July 2026, 41.4% in August 2026, 39.1% in September 2026, and 41.3% in October 2026.

Raw presence fell from 64.1% of July 2026 qualified observations to 49.2% in October 2026, a 14.9-point drop. The recommended top-three rate fell from 29.1% to 24.2%, and the rank-one rate fell from 2.0% to 0.4%. Bloom Nutrition held 104 valid recommendations in October 2026 and 124 present mentions.

The distinction is between a brand whose overall footprint has shrunk materially across the series and whose first-place presence has nearly disappeared. The October recovery sits within a category where the gap between Bloom Nutrition and Organifi narrowed from 49.4 points in July 2026 to 22.7 points in October 2026, though it widened slightly in the final month.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt categories stopped surfacing Bloom Nutrition between July and October 2026, and which brands appear in its place?

Live it Up: Significant decliner with a narrowing gap to Organifi

Live it Up's valid recommendation coverage fell from 52.3% in July 2026 to 39.7% in October 2026, a significant 12.6-point decline. The month-to-month move from September to October was a 0.3-point gain following a series low of 39.4% in September 2026. Coverage across the series read 52.3% in July 2026, 43.0% in August 2026, 39.4% in September 2026, and 39.7% in October 2026.

The placement story is sharper than the coverage story. Live it Up's recommended top-three rate fell from 45.5% in July 2026 to 27.4% in October 2026, an 18.1-point decline. Its rank-one rate fell from 11.0% to 5.6%, a 5.4-point drop. Raw presence fell from 57.3% to 45.2%, a 12.1-point decline. Live it Up held 100 valid recommendations in October 2026 and 114 present mentions.

The distinction is between a brand that remains present in a meaningful share of answers and a brand whose position within those answers has fallen well below the top three. The Live it Up to Organifi gap narrowed every month of the series, ending at 21.1 points in October 2026 from 47.5 points in July 2026.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompts keep Live it Up present while placing it below the top three, and which brands take those higher slots?

Garden of Life: Stable coverage with a mid-series placement recovery

Garden of Life's valid recommendation coverage moved from 40.4% in July 2026 to 38.5% in October 2026, a 1.9-point decline within normal variation. Coverage across the series read 40.4% in July 2026, 34.9% in August 2026, 39.1% in September 2026, and 38.5% in October 2026, with a 5.5-point largest single-month move. Rank-one rate was flat at 4.0% across the comparison, and raw presence fell from 44.9% to 41.7%. Garden of Life held 97 valid recommendations in October 2026.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompts keep Garden of Life present without converting to top-three placements?

Transparent Labs: Stable coverage with a rank-one decline

Transparent Labs' valid recommendation coverage moved from 34.8% in July 2026 to 33.7% in October 2026, a 1.1-point decline within normal variation. Rank-one rate fell from 4.2% to 1.2% over the same window, a 3.0-point drop, and its recommended top-three rate rose from 16.1% to 19.4%. Transparent Labs held 85 valid recommendations in October 2026 and 87 present mentions.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which answers place Transparent Labs in the top three without placing it first, and what has changed in those answer contexts since July 2026?

KOS and Nested Naturals: Small-count positions

KOS's valid recommendation coverage rose from 1.7% in July 2026 to 4.0% in October 2026, a 2.3-point gain, and Nested Naturals moved from 5.7% to 5.2%, a 0.5-point decline. KOS held 10 valid recommendations in October 2026; Nested Naturals held 13. Neither brand recorded a rank-one placement in the baseline or current month.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which specific prompts surface these brands at all, and what keeps their recommendation counts in the low double digits?

Buyer-Intent Interpretation

Questions This Section Answers

• Which buyer-intent clusters does the October 2026 qualified set actually cover?
• What commercial questions about pricing and head-to-head comparison remain unanswered by the benchmark?

In October 2026, all 252 qualified observations fell into the discovery and consideration class, with no observations registered in the comparison or pricing-and-cost classes. The public benchmark therefore captures how AI systems recommend brands in response to direct discovery-style prompts, but it cannot yet answer the commercial questions that belong to later-stage buying behavior. Price sensitivity, value perception, and direct head-to-head brand comparisons are not represented in the current qualified set. That gap is material for a category where the conflict monitoring recorded multiple price inconsistencies across platforms in the same period.

Brand Opportunity Summary

Questions This Section Answers

• What is the highest-priority diagnostic for each tracked brand based on its October 2026 signal?
• Which brands warrant attention because of significant declines or sustained rises in coverage?

The benchmark identifies where attention is warranted; a company-level analysis is needed to explain why.

Evidence Behind the Benchmark

The aggregate metrics are built from prompt-level observations (query, surface, recommendation outcome, rank, sentiment, and citations where exposed). Company-level analysis can go deeper into prompt, competitor, surface, and evidence patterns. Source presence is not automatically treated as proof of causation.

About This Benchmark

This report is part of the LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery research program.

• AI Visibility Industry Market Methodology
• AI Visibility Industry Market Metrics
• AI Visibility Industry Market Standards

Report-Specific Interpretation Notes

• Small-count brands: coverage rates for KOS (4.0%, 10 valid recommendations) and Nested Naturals (5.2%, 13 valid recommendations) rest on small absolute counts; percentage movements should be read with that context.
• The qualified denominator (252 observations in October 2026) is smaller than earlier months in the series; brand percentages reflect only the qualified set, and the qualified set is the smallest reading in the July-to-October 2026 series.
• Directional analysis identifies where movement occurred; it does not establish why that movement happened.
• The category-level pattern comes from multi-month trends for Organifi, Bloom Nutrition, and Live it Up, and from the widening coverage gap between AG1 and the rest of the field.

Next Step

The Public Benchmark Shows Where a Brand Is Winning or Losing. A Company-Level Audit Shows Why.

Beneath the aggregate percentages sit the questions that matter for strategy: which high-intent prompts are won, which competitor takes the recommendation when a brand loses, what attributes AI systems associate with each option, and which external sources shape those answers. For a category where the leader extended its rank-one share, one brand rose for a third consecutive month, two established brands remained well below their July 2026 positions, and conflict monitoring recorded multiple price and availability inconsistencies, understanding the specific prompts behind those shifts is essential.

A company-specific AI visibility audit maps those prompt, surface, competitor, ranking, sentiment, and evidence-source patterns into a prioritized visibility strategy. It moves from the benchmark's category-level finding to the brand-level diagnosis needed to act.

Request an AI visibility audit