Prioritized plan
Sequenced actions with owners, dependencies, and acceptance checks, so each item has a clear definition of done.
/ Connected AI Visibility Program
Turn AI visibility gaps into coordinated, measurable work.
Connect measurement, website consistency, external evidence, priority-page optimization, and buyer-question publishing in one closed loop. Start with the workstreams you need now and rebalance them as the evidence changes.
Scope and pricing are agreed before work starts.
/ The system
One connected loop from measurement to remeasurement.
- 01
Measure what buyers see
Benchmark the questions, platforms, competitors, recommendations, citations, and factual accuracy that matter to the buying journey.
- 02
Make the website consistent
Resolve conflicting facts, claims, service descriptions, and entity signals across priority pages.
- 03
Align the external narrative
Strengthen the credible sources, research, reviews, and public context that help others verify the company.
- 04
Optimize priority pages for AI search
Improve the pages buyers and AI systems need for comparisons, decisions, and accurate retrieval.
- 05
Publish around buyer questions
Create useful website, research, social, and video assets around the questions measurement shows are commercially important.
Behind Step 1, CiteWorks maps the market, benchmarks visibility, and analyzes gaps. That diagnosis becomes the corrective roadmap. Steps 2 to 5 execute the roadmap, and remeasurement determines what happens next.
/ Sequence
The first 90 days, then the ongoing loop.
- 01
Days 0 to 30: Establish truth and benchmark
Agree buyer situations, controlled prompts, factual gaps, priority pages, competitors, and source opportunities.
- 02
Days 31 to 60: Repair and publish
Correct owned inconsistencies, improve priority pages, build evidence, and publish approved assets.
- 03
Days 61 to 90: Remeasure and allocate
Run the controlled benchmark again and decide which workstreams to scale, maintain, narrow, replace, or stop.
- 04
Month 4 onward: Follow the evidence
Preserve the stable benchmark while the commercial mix expands or contracts around measured priorities.
/ Overview
A plan is useful when the work gets done.
- Competitors are better represented on the questions that matter most to your buyers.
- Technical, content, and research ownership is fragmented across teams or suppliers.
- A roadmap exists, but no one has the agreed capacity to execute it.
GEO builds on foundational SEO, with additional measurement of AI answers and the sources they reference.
/ Deliverables
What the program produces.
Scope is selected from the diagnosis. Not every service is compulsory in every program.
Coordinates the program
Selected workstreams
Website improvements
Scoped technical fixes, accurate entity facts, and clearer commercial pages, agreed with your team before publication.
Evidence and source work
Original research assets, and approved publication or community participation where it is relevant to your category.
Closes the loop
Progress review
Delivered actions set against dated, scoped measured observations, reported separately rather than merged into one claim.
Illustrative roadmap view. Not client data, and not a fixed deliverable for every program.
/ Proof
Two published cases.
These engagements had different scopes, query sets, platforms, and timeframes. They are reported observations, not causal proof and not promised results.
/ Process
How the program runs.
- 01
Review existing evidence
We start from the reporting and findings you already hold, and audit only where the evidence is missing.
- 02
Agree and deliver
Scope and responsibilities are agreed, and your team reviews the facts before anything is published.
- 03
Validate and reprioritize
Completed changes and any visibility movement are reported separately, with platform variation noted.
/ Methods
Use the method the gap actually requires.
The program is built around the gap, not a fixed checklist. These methods are used only when they help answer or fix the problem in scope.
Diagnosis
Diagnosed visibility gap
Scope is selected from the diagnosis, then delivered with agreed owners, dependencies, and acceptance checks, and reviewed with delivered actions kept separate from measured observations.
- Technical SEOResolve access, rendering, structure, and performance barriers.Learn more
- Entity OptimizationAlign company, service, people, and market facts across the pages in scope.Learn more
- Citation ArchitectureMap the public evidence around the questions buyers are asking.Learn more
- Company Social Content & DistributionOptional review methodRepurpose freshly optimized pages and research into approved posts for authorized company social accounts. Selected only when distribution suits the diagnosed gap.Learn more
- Embedding AnalysisOptional review methodUse chosen-model text representations as an optional input to a content review.Learn more
- Cosine Gap AnalysisOptional review methodUse vector similarity as a defined comparison method, then validate the finding against the page, buyer question, and evidence.Learn more
Embedding and cosine analysis are optional review methods. They are not required components of every GEO engagement and do not reveal proprietary platform ranking or retrieval scores.
/ Delivery
Your team, our team, or both.
In-house
Fits where SEO, content, and measurement capacity already exist and one accountable owner connects them.
CiteWorks support
Fits where specialist research, delivery coordination, or straightforward capacity is the constraint.
Hybrid
Your existing agency or internal team keeps the work it owns best, and we take the rest by agreement.
/ Pricing & scope
Configure this scope around your priorities.
Adjust the quantities to create a planning estimate. You can use a service on its own or combine it with the full five-step system. We review every configuration before work begins.
Intelligence and measurement
Monthly · $100 per buyer-intent cluster
1 cluster = 10 related buyer-intent prompts. The controlled starting benchmark is 10 clusters / 100 prompts across 6-7 agreed LLMs, or approximately 600-700 prompt-platform runs per wave.
Not included.
$0
0 buyer-intent clusters
Monthly · $100 per additional 10-prompt cluster
Add clusters beyond the controlled baseline without replacing it. Themes can cover competitors, use cases, locations, products, audiences, or other high-converting situations.
Not included.
$0
0 additional 10-prompt clusters
Monthly · $2,500 per additional market/language
Not included.
$0
0 additional markets/languages
Website and content
Monthly · $200 per page/entity
Not included.
$0
0 pages/entities
Monthly · $200 per content asset
Not included.
$0
0 content assets
One-time · $10,000 per initial technical implementation
Not included.
$0
One-time · $20,000 per project activation
Not included.
$0
Monthly · $50 per published item/implementation
Not included.
$0
0 published items/implementations
Evidence and authority
Monthly · $500 per study/report/data asset
Not included.
$0
0 studies/reports/data assets
Monthly · $75 per participating customer
Not included.
$0
0 participating customers
Production and distribution
Monthly · $100 per social/visual asset
Not included.
$0
0 social/visual assets
Monthly · $500 per video
Not included.
$0
0 videos
Monthly · $2,000 per activated ongoing module
Not included.
$0
Pass-through at cost · At cost
Enter an approved planning allowance. Actual third-party spend requires approval and is passed through at cost.
Not included.
$0
$
Estimate summary
Selected services: 0
- Estimated monthly recurring
- $0
- Estimated one-time
- $0
- Estimated approved pass-through
- $0
- Estimated first month
- $0
- Estimated ongoing monthly
- $0
Estimated first month $0. Estimated ongoing monthly $0.
Planning estimate only. Final scope, cadence, dependencies, third-party costs, and commercial terms are confirmed in a written statement of work. AI rankings, citations, traffic, revenue, and editorial outcomes are not guaranteed.
Measurement describes a defined sample of prompts, platforms, and locations on the dates observed, and results vary between runs. Client factual approval is required before anything is published, and publishers and platforms keep editorial and ranking control.
We review the configuration for dependencies, sequencing, feasibility, and third-party costs before proposing a final scope.
/ FAQ
Practical questions.
Does this replace our SEO?
No. GEO builds on foundational SEO. Crawlability, structure, and content quality still matter, and in most programs they are strengthened rather than set aside.
How is this different from AI visibility measurement?
This is an execution program. Monitoring is a scoped observation activity that sits alongside it and tells us what to prioritize next.
Do we need a new audit first?
Not always. We review the evidence you already have, and only audit the areas where the picture is genuinely missing.
What does it cost, and how long does it run?
We agree the scope, delivery capacity, price, and review schedule with you before work starts.
GEO, AEO, AI SEO: what is the difference?
These industry labels overlap, and providers use them differently. We agree the practical work, platforms, and measures in scope. None of these labels implies guaranteed inclusion in an AI answer.
/ Scope
A complete system is often stronger. A smaller scope can still be right.
If the evidence shows one concentrated gap, buy that service individually. If the gap crosses the website, source environment, technical foundation, and publishing cadence, connect the workstreams so they share one benchmark and prioritization loop.
/ Next step
Agree the priorities before another planning cycle passes.
Configure the workstreams above, then send the configuration to us for review. We review every request manually and respond within one business day.