CiteWorks Studio

How AI Search Is Recommending Financial Services: Monthly Trends

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
11 minutes read

Key Takeaways

  • The benchmark tracks how AI assistants recommend mortgage lenders across major platforms.
  • Rocket Mortgage remains the leader, but its valid recommendation coverage declined in August 2026.
  • Pennymac and Veterans United Home Loans form the strongest challenger tier behind Rocket Mortgage.
  • Raw presence alone does not guarantee shortlist placement, so lenders need stronger evidence to convert mentions into recommendations.

This analysis examines how six major mortgage lenders appear in AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. The current benchmark covers August 2026 with 427 observations, compared against the July 2026 baseline of 471 observations. The LLM Authority Index tracked all six companies across 427 prompts in August 2026, with 299 valid recommendation shortlists and a total modeled opportunity value of $944,460.

Executive Summary

Rocket Mortgage remains the clear leader in AI-generated mortgage lender recommendations, but August 2026 marked the first month of real movement in this two-month series. Rocket Mortgage's valid recommendation coverage moved from 75.4% in July 2026 to 68.4% in August 2026, a 7.0-point move large enough to stand out from the rest of the category's normal variation. No other brand moved beyond its own normal range in either direction this month.

Five of the six tracked brands — Freedom Mortgage, loanDepot, New American Funding, Pennymac, and Veterans United Home Loans — remained within their stable range. Pennymac's valid recommendation coverage moved from 25.5% to 30.4%, the largest raw movement among the stable group, while New American Funding moved from 21.0% to 16.2%. loanDepot and Veterans United Home Loans held close to their July 2026 levels, and Freedom Mortgage improved modestly from 9.8% to 11.2%.

Because this is only the second month of tracked data, the current result establishes a direction to watch rather than a confirmed trend. Rocket Mortgage's decline is the first departure from an otherwise stable baseline-to-current pattern across the category.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Rocket Mortgage-7.0% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202675.4%
    Aug 202668.4%
  • Veterans United Home Loans-1.1%
    Jul 202648.4%
    Aug 202647.3%
  • Pennymac+4.9%
    Jul 202625.5%
    Aug 202630.4%
  • loanDepot-1.2%
    Jul 202631.2%
    Aug 202630.0%
  • New American Funding-4.8%
    Jul 202621.0%
    Aug 202616.2%
  • Freedom Mortgage+1.4%
    Jul 20269.8%
    Aug 202611.2%

Benchmark Snapshot

Metric

July 2026

August 2026

Change

AI answers analyzed

471

427

-44

Platforms tracked

6

6

No change

Companies tracked

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answers

290 (61.6%)

246 (57.6%)

-44 (-4.0 pts)

Valid recommendation shortlists

343 (72.8%)

299 (70.0%)

-44 (-2.8 pts)

Total modeled opportunity value

$824,992.50

$944,460.00

+$119,467.50

Category leader (valid recommendation coverage)

Rocket Mortgage (75.4%)

Rocket Mortgage (68.4%)

-7.0 pts

What Changed This Month

The commercial consequence of August 2026 is a measurable shift in AI recommendation concentration, but the category leader's dominance is not in question. Rocket Mortgage's valid recommendation coverage fell from 75.4% in July 2026 to 68.4% in August 2026, a drop of 7.0 percentage points, the largest single-month move recorded in this series so far. The brand still appears in more than two-thirds of valid recommendation shortlists, and its raw mention presence rate remains at 95.3%, meaning it is nearly always in the conversation. The decline is in how often Rocket Mortgage converts presence into a recommendation, not in whether it is present.

The distribution of that lost recommendation share matters for competitive positioning. Pennymac captured the largest gain, moving from 25.5% to 30.4% valid recommendation coverage. This 4.9-point movement stayed within Pennymac's normal range of variation, but it narrows the gap with Rocket Mortgage from 49.9 points in July 2026 to 38.0 points in August 2026. Freedom Mortgage also moved up, from 9.8% to 11.2%, with improvements in raw mention presence (17.6% to 22.9%) and top-3 recommendation rate (2.3% to 4.9%).

For lenders watching the middle of the field, the movement was less favorable. New American Funding moved from 21.0% to 16.2% valid recommendation coverage, including a drop in top-3 recommendation rate from 7.6% to 4.5%. loanDepot slipped slightly from 31.2% to 30.0%, and Veterans United Home Loans held nearly steady at 47.3% versus 48.4%. All three of these movements remained within each brand's normal range of variation.

Trend Table

Brand

Baseline

Current

Movement Since Baseline

Position Label

Rocket Mortgage

75.4%

68.4%

-7.0

Leader, significant decline

Veterans United Home Loans

48.4%

47.3%

-1.1

Strong challenger

Pennymac

25.5%

30.4%

+4.9

Mid-tier riser

loanDepot

31.2%

30.0%

-1.2

Mid-tier

New American Funding

21.0%

16.2%

-4.8

Lower tier, declining

Freedom Mortgage

9.8%

11.2%

+1.4

Lower tier, improving

Methodology

  1. The LLM Authority Index benchmark analyzed 471 prompts in July 2026 and 427 prompts in August 2026 across six AI platforms: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity.
  2. Six mortgage lending brands were tracked: Freedom Mortgage, New American Funding, Pennymac, Rocket Mortgage, Veterans United Home Loans, and loanDepot.
  3. The primary metric, valid recommendation coverage, measures the percentage of AI answers that include a brand in a recommendation shortlist, ranked list, or other recommendation-shaped response.
  4. Valid recommendation shortlists numbered 343 in July 2026 (72.8% of answers) and 299 in August 2026 (70.0% of answers).
  5. Supporting metrics include raw mention presence rate, top-3 recommendation rate, rank-1 recommendation rate, and net sentiment score by mentions.
  6. Modeled AI Authority Value is a modeled figure representing the relative share of AI-driven opportunity a brand captures. It is not revenue, pipeline, or demand.
  7. Response types included recommendation shortlists, ranked lists, factual answers, comparison analyses, pricing analyses, and mixed formats.
  8. The total modeled opportunity value across the category was 944,460 in August 2026.
  9. Query volume data showed a median of 10 in July 2026 and 20 in August 2026, with a zero-volume share of 38.6% in July 2026 and 25.3% in August 2026. Modeled dollar values should be read as relative indicators of opportunity concentration, not precise revenue estimates.
  10. Movement classification (stable, riser, or decliner) is calibrated per brand based on each brand's historical volatility, so brands with more volatile histories require larger swings before a movement is classified as material.
  11. Comparability between months is based on consistent instrument version, platform coverage, and prompt methodology. Normal variation means individual brands can move several percentage points between months without indicating a durable trend; only sustained movements across multiple months should guide strategic decisions.

Key Findings

The category leader's grip on AI recommendations loosened for the first time in this series, creating a data point challengers should watch. Rocket Mortgage's valid recommendation coverage fell from 75.4% in July 2026 to 68.4% in August 2026, a 7.0-point move that is the largest recorded so far in this two-month series. The brand still holds the top position by a wide margin, but the direction of movement is newly worth watching.

Pennymac recorded the most favorable movement of August 2026, though it remained within its normal range of variation. Valid recommendation coverage moved from 25.5% to 30.4%, while raw mention presence moved from 37.6% to 43.3% and Modeled AI Authority Value moved from 51,993.50. The gap between Pennymac and Rocket Mortgage narrowed by 11.9 points, the largest single-month narrowing among the tracked brand pairs.

Freedom Mortgage improved its recommendation position despite starting from the lowest base. Recommended top-3 rate moved from 2.3% to 4.9%, and raw mention presence moved from 17.6% to 22.9%. Valid recommendation coverage moved from 9.8% to 11.2%. These are small absolute numbers but represent the sharpest rate of improvement in the category.

New American Funding lost recommendation ground even as its sentiment remained strong. Valid recommendation coverage declined from 21.0% to 16.2%, with top-3 recommendation rate falling from 7.6% to 4.5%. The brand's net sentiment score of 0.92 in August 2026 was the highest in the category, indicating that when the brand appears, it is viewed favorably. The issue is frequency and recommendation placement, not perception.

Most of the category did not move in August 2026, which is itself a finding. Five of six brands remained within stable classification bands. Veterans United Home Loans held at 47.3% versus 48.4%, loanDepot slipped from 31.2% to 30.0%, and the overall category structure remained intact outside of the Rocket Mortgage decline.

Company Comparison

The following comparison places each brand's August 2026 position in context across the full set of tracked metrics. Valid recommendation coverage tells which brands AI systems select; Modeled AI Authority Value reflects the modeled opportunity associated with that selection.

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Modeled AI Authority Value

Rocket Mortgage

95.3%

68.4%

50.1%

31.4%

$241,886.89

Veterans United Home Loans

53.4%

47.3%

28.3%

17.1%

$58,971.09

Pennymac

43.3%

30.4%

13.6%

4.7%

$51,993.50

loanDepot

38.9%

30.0%

9.4%

2.1%

$20,813.47

New American Funding

17.6%

16.2%

4.5%

0.5%

$2,239.04

Freedom Mortgage

22.9%

11.2%

4.9%

0.7%

$2,111.77

The August 2026 data reveals a category with three distinct tiers. Rocket Mortgage operates alone at the top, followed by Veterans United Home Loans as a credible challenger, and then a cluster of four brands competing for the remaining recommendation share. The most notable feature of this comparison is the difference between presence and recommendation. Rocket Mortgage converts 95.3% presence into 68.4% coverage. Veterans United Home Loans converts 53.4% presence into 47.3% coverage, a much tighter alignment between the two figures. Pennymac converts 43.3% presence into 30.4% coverage, and loanDepot converts 38.9% presence into 30.0% coverage.

The modeled AI Authority Value figures follow a related but distinct pattern. Rocket Mortgage's Modeled AI Authority Value moved from 241,886.89 in August 2026, even as its valid recommendation coverage moved down. This is a reminder that the modeled-value layer and the recommendation-coverage layer can move in different directions in the same month, and that modeled value reflects more than a single rate metric.

The Competitive Repositioning Underneath

The most consequential shift in August 2026 is visible in the gaps between brands, not just in individual brand movements. The gap analysis shows three pairings where separation changed meaningfully between July 2026 and August 2026.

Brand Pair

Gap July 2026

Gap August 2026

Change

Pennymac vs. Rocket Mortgage

-49.9

-38.0

11.9 points narrower

New American Funding vs. Pennymac

-4.5

-14.2

9.7 points wider

Freedom Mortgage vs. Rocket Mortgage

-65.6

-57.2

8.4 points narrower

The Pennymac-Rocket Mortgage gap narrowing is the headline. A 49.9-point gap closing to 38.0 points in a single month is the kind of movement that, if sustained across additional months, would meaningfully change the category's competitive structure. The New American Funding-Pennymac gap widening is the counterweight: while Pennymac closed ground on the leader, it simultaneously opened distance on the brand below it. This is a category with real movement at the margins, even as the overall structure holds.

For decision-makers, the commercial implication is that the AI recommendation landscape is not static. Positions can shift by meaningful margins in a single month. The question is whether these shifts persist or revert. A single month of data cannot answer that, but it can flag where to watch.

Why Visibility Is Not Enough

Pennymac's August 2026 profile illustrates the core distinction between being seen and being recommended. The brand appeared in 43.3% of all AI answers, up from 37.6% in July 2026. Its valid recommendation coverage was 30.4%, well below its presence rate. Pennymac is being mentioned, discussed, and surfaced, but it is not always being selected.

The commercial consequence of this distinction is that presence alone does not carry the same modeled value as a recommendation. Pennymac's Modeled AI Authority Value of $51,993.50 in August 2026 reflects the combined weight of its presence and its recommendation activity; the benchmark does not separately itemize a visibility-only value versus a recommendation-only value. Brands that build presence without converting it into recommendation placement are capturing a weaker share of the available opportunity.

For lenders, the strategic takeaway is that presence is the entry ticket, but recommendation is the prize. Building content that AI systems cite favorably is table stakes. Engineering that content so it leads to recommendation placement is where the modeled value concentrates. Rocket Mortgage leads the category on both raw mention presence (95.3%) and valid recommendation coverage (68.4%), and its $241,886.89 Modeled AI Authority Value in August 2026 reflects that dual strength.

What Brands Need to Fix

For sustained decliners like Rocket Mortgage: The August 2026 decline in valid recommendation coverage from 75.4% to 68.4% is the most notable movement in the two-month series. Even at the reduced level, the brand remains well ahead of the rest of the field. Raw mention presence held nearly steady, easing from 98.1% to 95.3%, while valid recommendation coverage moved by a wider margin. That pattern suggests the change is concentrated in how often the brand converts presence into a recommendation, not in whether AI systems mention it at all. The priority is understanding which prompt types and platforms are associated with the shift.

For brands moving up this month, like Pennymac and Freedom Mortgage: Both brands moved up in August 2026, but from different bases. Pennymac's move from 25.5% to 30.4% valid recommendation coverage, and its narrower gap with the leader, warrant attention even though the change falls within Pennymac's normal range of variation. Freedom Mortgage's move from 9.8% to 11.2% is small in absolute terms but came with gains in top-3 recommendation rate (2.3% to 4.9%). The priority is reinforcing the content and signal patterns associated with these gains.

For stable brands like Veterans United Home Loans, loanDepot, and New American Funding: Veterans United Home Loans holds a credible second position at 47.3% coverage, but its 1.1-point decline in August 2026, while within its normal range, deserves monitoring. loanDepot's slight decline to 30.0% and New American Funding's larger drop to 16.2% both suggest the middle of the market is contestable. New American Funding's high sentiment score (0.92) indicates the raw material for stronger recommendations exists; the gap is in frequency and placement.

How CiteWorks Studio Helps

1) Map AI recommendation visibility. The LLM Authority Index provides the benchmark. CiteWorks Studio interprets it, converting raw coverage rates, presence figures, and sentiment scores into a commercial picture of where each brand stands and what moves are material.

2) Identify the sources shaping AI answers. The benchmark identifies which platforms and answer types are associated with recommendation outcomes. Understanding where the AI systems source their answers lets lenders focus remediation on the content and citations that are most likely to influence placement.

3) Build the citation architecture plan. Beyond visibility, the goal is recommendation conversion. CiteWorks Studio develops the plan to move brands from being mentioned to being selected, targeting the specific content gaps and source patterns the benchmark surfaces.

Commercial Takeaway

The decision-relevant finding for August 2026 is that the category leader's recommendation coverage moved down while the rest of the field stayed largely within normal range. Rocket Mortgage's 7.0-point move in valid recommendation coverage, from 75.4% to 68.4%, is the first notable movement recorded in this two-month series. Leaders should treat this as a signal that AI recommendation positions are contestable even for a dominant brand. Challengers such as Pennymac, which narrowed its gap with the leader, should treat the month as a data point worth tracking, not yet as confirmed rebalancing.

The second decision-relevant finding concerns the modeled opportunity pool itself, not brand performance. The total modeled opportunity value moved from 944,460 in August 2026. This is a modeled benchmark value used to compare relative standing across brands and months; it is not revenue, pipeline, or demand. Brands with strong recommendation-stage visibility, rather than raw mention volume, are best positioned to capture value from this pool as more months of data accumulate.

See Where Your Brand Stands in AI Recommendations

The August 2026 benchmark shows a category where one brand's recommendation coverage moved down while most of the field held steady. For lenders, the open question is not whether AI systems are shaping mortgage discovery, that is established, but whether your brand is being recommended or merely mentioned. A brand-specific Authority Index report can show which prompts, platforms, and source patterns are driving your current standing, and where the gap between presence and recommendation is largest for your brand specifically.

Benchmark Source

This analysis is based on the LLM Authority Index benchmark for July 2026 and August 2026, tracking six mortgage lenders across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. The measurement window covered 898 total observations across both months. The LLM Authority Index is the research authority; CiteWorks Studio provides interpretation and strategy. Modeled opportunity values are relative indicators, not revenue or demand figures.

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

What Is AI Citation Intelligence?
AI citation intelligence is the process of measuring where AI platforms source their information and how frequently a brand is mentioned or referenced in AI-generated responses. Because LLMs synthesize across multiple sources, the sites and brands that appear repeatedly tend to influence how a topic or company is framed. This practice focuses on identifying which sources shape AI outputs and tracking brand visibility across different AI systems.
What Is Citation Architecture?
Citation architecture describes the set of sources that consistently inform how AI systems talk about a brand, product, or topic. LLMs draw from websites, articles, forums, and public discussion, and the sources they rely on most often become the backbone of their answers. Building strong citation architecture means ensuring that accurate, credible, high authority sources are the ones most likely to shape the way AI tools summarize and recommend a brand.
What Is Generative Engine Optimization?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of improving the chances that AI systems use and cite your brand or content when generating answers. While traditional SEO is centered on ranking pages in search results, GEO focuses on how LLMs retrieve, interpret, and combine information when responding to a question. The objective is to strengthen the content and sources AI systems rely on, so your brand is treated as a trusted reference in AI responses.
What Is AI Share of Voice?
AI share of voice tracks how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers compared with competitors in the same category. It reflects visibility across AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Monitoring AI share of voice helps organizations see whether AI systems consistently include and recommend their brand for key queries or whether competitor brands are showing up more often.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT