CiteWorks Studio

Edens Garden AI Market Strategy Report - Essential Oils

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
4 minutes read

On this report

Key Takeaways

  • Edens Garden ranks as the strongest challenger in essential oil recommendations, with 36.8% mention presence and an 18.5% Top 3 recommendation rate across 1,277 observations.
  • The brand’s main weakness is first-position conversion: it earns only a 2.1% rank-one rate and receives no rank-one recommendations on ChatGPT or Google AI Mode.
  • Pricing and cost queries are Edens Garden’s strongest area, while broader best-brand queries show weaker conversion from mentions into recommendations.
  • Sentiment is a clear advantage, with a 0.72 score driven by 339 positive mentions and just 1 negative mention across all tracked platforms.

Answer Capsule

Edens Garden holds the strongest challenger position in the essential oil category across six AI platforms in June 2026, with an 18.5% Top 3 recommendation rate and a sentiment score of 0.72. The brand appears in 36.8% of all 1,277 AI observations but converts only 22.2% into valid recommendations. Its modeled monthly AI Authority Value of $669K represents 3.25% of a $20.6M category opportunity, roughly half of category leader Plant Therapy's $1.26M. The primary gap is a 2.1% rank-one rate, meaning Edens Garden is frequently recommended but rarely the first choice.

Who This Report Is For

This report is for Edens Garden's marketing, brand strategy, and digital leadership teams evaluating how AI-generated recommendations are shaping buyer shortlists in the essential oil category.

Report Card

  • Report type: AI Company Market Strategy Report
  • Target company: Edens Garden
  • Category / market studied: Essential Oil
  • Reporting month: June 2026
  • AI platforms tracked: ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews
  • Public high-intent clusters: 3 (Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks, Essential Oil Brand Comparisons, Essential Oil Pricing & Cost Evaluation)
  • AI observations analyzed: 1,277
  • Competitors tracked: 10

Executive Summary

Edens Garden is the clear second-position brand in AI-generated essential oil recommendations, trailing only Plant Therapy across all three public buyer-stage clusters. The brand appears in 470 of 1,277 total observations, giving it a raw mention presence rate of 36.8%. Of those appearances, 284 qualify as valid recommendations, producing a valid recommendation coverage rate of 22.2%.

The brand's net sentiment score of 0.72 is strong, supported by 339 positive mentions, 130 neutral mentions, and only 1 negative mention across the entire dataset. That near-zero negative visibility is a meaningful competitive advantage, particularly compared to legacy MLM brands such as doTERRA and Young Living, which carry negative sentiment scores.

Edens Garden's strongest cluster is Essential Oil Pricing & Cost Evaluation, where it captures $234K in modeled monthly AI Authority Value. Its weakest cluster is Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks, where its Top 3 rate of 16.2% falls below its performance in comparison and pricing queries.

The brand's strongest platform signal is Google AI Overviews, where it captures $333K in monthly AI Authority Value with a 22.8% Top 3 rate and a 6% rank-one rate. Its clearest platform gap is ChatGPT, where it receives zero rank-one recommendations despite a 40.7% mention presence rate.

Edens Garden's total modeled monthly AI Authority Value of $669K represents 3.25% of the total $20.6M monthly AI opportunity. While this is roughly half of Plant Therapy's $1.26M, it places Edens Garden significantly ahead of the next tier of competitors.

What Edens Garden Is Winning

Strongest challenger position across all three buyer stages. Edens Garden is the only brand that consistently appears in the second recommendation position across consideration, evaluation, and decision-stage prompts. No other brand holds this cross-cluster consistency.

Near-zero negative sentiment. With only 1 negative mention out of 470 total appearances, Edens Garden has one of the cleanest public evidence layers in the category. This is a structural advantage: AI systems can recommend the brand without cautionary framing.

Dominant performance in the pricing cluster. Edens Garden captures $234K in modeled value in the Essential Oil Pricing & Cost Evaluation cluster. A Top 3 rate of 20.1% in this high-intent cluster (1.5x buyer stage multiplier) reflects strong price-comparison content in the brand's public evidence layer.

Strong Google AI Overviews presence. On Google AI Overviews, Edens Garden achieves a 22.8% Top 3 rate and captures $333K in monthly AI Authority Value, its strongest platform performance. This platform is particularly significant because Google AI Overviews surface directly in search results, reaching buyers at the moment of query.

Where Edens Garden Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps

Low rank-one rate across all platforms. Edens Garden's overall rank-one rate is 2.1%. On ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, the rank-one rate is zero. Plant Therapy, by contrast, holds a 26.5% rank-one rate. Edens Garden is consistently the second choice, which limits its capture of first-position recommendation value.

Weak recommendation conversion on ChatGPT. Despite appearing in 40.7% of ChatGPT observations, Edens Garden receives zero rank-one recommendations on this platform. Its valid recommendation coverage on ChatGPT is 22.7%, but an average recommended rank of 2.86 means it is consistently placed behind Plant Therapy. This pattern suggests ChatGPT's source synthesis favors Plant Therapy in head-to-head comparisons.

Underperformance in the consideration cluster relative to presence. In the Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks cluster, Edens Garden appears in 39.6% of observations but achieves only a 16.2% Top 3 rate. The gap between presence and recommendation conversion indicates the brand is known but not prioritized in general awareness queries.

Perplexity underperformance. On Perplexity, Edens Garden captures only $20K in modeled value despite a 30.1% mention presence rate. Its average recommended rank of 3.31 on this platform is the weakest among platforms where the brand receives recommendations, suggesting Perplexity's source selection does not favor Edens Garden as strongly as other platforms do.

The Biggest Opportunity

Converting Edens Garden's strong second-position presence into rank-one recommendations requires a more authoritative public evidence layer in the consideration and evaluation clusters. The brand already wins on sentiment and pricing content. The missing piece is the type of editorial, third-party, and comparison content that AI systems use to justify a first-choice recommendation. Strengthening citation architecture in the Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks cluster is the highest-leverage path from "also recommended" to "top recommended" across a meaningful share of prompts.

Prompt Evidence

Gemini / Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks Prompt: "What are the best essential oil brands?" Result: Edens Garden appeared in the response but was listed after Plant Therapy, consistent with its second-position pattern.

Google AI Overviews / Essential Oil Pricing & Cost Evaluation Prompt: "Compare essential oil brands by price and quality" Result: Edens Garden received a strong recommendation with positive framing, reflecting its strength in the pricing cluster.

ChatGPT / Essential Oil Brand Comparisons Prompt: "Which essential oil company is the most affordable?" Result: Edens Garden was mentioned but not ranked first. Plant Therapy was the primary recommendation, with Edens Garden listed as an alternative.

Perplexity / Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks Prompt: "Recommend essential oil brands for beginners" Result: Edens Garden appeared in the response at a lower rank than its average, suggesting Perplexity's source mix does not prioritize the brand as strongly in beginner-focused queries.

Phase 1: AI Market Discovery Audit. Map Edens Garden's full recommendation footprint across all 10 clusters and 6 platforms to identify the specific prompts where rank-one displacement occurs and which sources are driving Plant Therapy's first-position advantage.

Phase 2: Recommendation Readiness Plan. Identify the specific content gaps in the consideration and evaluation clusters that prevent Edens Garden from converting second-position presence into first-choice recommendations.

Phase 3: Owned Answer Layer Buildout. Develop comparison-friendly product content, pricing transparency pages, and third-party review integration that gives AI systems more authoritative material to synthesize when ranking brands.

Phase 4: Citation and Authority Layer Development. Strengthen the editorial, review, and community source footprint that AI systems use to justify rank-one recommendations, with priority on ChatGPT and Perplexity where the brand currently underperforms.

Phase 5: Monthly AI Visibility and Recommendation Tracking. Monitor Edens Garden's rank-one rate, Top 3 coverage, and platform-specific performance to measure progress against Plant Therapy and identify emerging competitive threats.

Why Closing the Gap Matters

Edens Garden has built a public evidence layer strong enough to make it the consistent second choice in AI-generated essential oil recommendations. But in a category where Plant Therapy captures 6.1% of the total AI opportunity and Edens Garden captures 3.25%, the distance between first and second represents approximately $588K per month in modeled value.

The opportunity is not about increasing brand awareness. Edens Garden is already present in 36.8% of AI responses. The path forward is converting that presence into rank-one recommendations by strengthening the specific source layers that AI systems use to determine first-choice status. Being the second brand recommended is a strong position. Being the first brand recommended is a different business outcome.

Core Metrics at a Glance

Metric

Value

Total mentions

470

Valid recommendations

284

Top 3 recommendation count

236

Rank #1 recommendation count

27

Average recommended rank

2.48

Positive mentions

339

Neutral mentions

130

Negative mentions

1

Raw mention presence rate

36.8%

Valid recommendation coverage

22.2%

Top 3 recommendation rate

18.5%

Rank #1 recommendation rate

2.1%

Strongest cluster (recommendation behavior)

Essential Oil Pricing & Cost Evaluation

Strongest platform (recommendation behavior)

Google AI Overviews

Sentiment Score

Sentiment Score = (339 × 1 + 130 × 0 + 1 × -1) / 470 = 338 / 470 = 0.72

Edens Garden's sentiment score of 0.72 is among the strongest in the category, driven by 339 positive mentions against only 1 negative mention. This matters because raw mention counts are a diagnostic signal, not a commercial KPI. A positive recommendation, a neutral reference, a cautionary mention, and a competitor-displaced mention carry different commercial weight. Classified sentiment is required before interpreting AI visibility; Edens Garden's sentiment profile is clean and commercially favorable.

Sentiment by Platform

Platform

Mentions

Positive

Neutral

Negative

Sentiment Score

Readout

ChatGPT

79

49

30

0

0.62

Present, but zero rank-one recommendations

Copilot

60

44

15

1

0.72

Strong positive signal

Gemini

73

63

10

0

0.86

Strongest public recommendation signal

Google AI Mode

94

67

27

0

0.71

Strong presence, zero rank-one

Google AI Overviews

107

74

33

0

0.69

Highest modeled value platform

Perplexity

57

42

15

0

0.74

Positive sentiment, low captured value

Methodology

  • This report evaluates Edens Garden's AI recommendation visibility against 9 competitor brands in the essential oil category.
  • Data was collected in June 2026.
  • Six AI platforms were tested: ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews.
  • A total of 1,277 observations were analyzed across all platforms and clusters.
  • The competitor universe includes 10 brands: Plant Therapy, Edens Garden, NOW Foods, Vitruvi, Young Living, doTERRA, Rocky Mountain Oils, Aura Cacia, Revive Essential Oils, and Public Goods.
  • Three public high-intent clusters were analyzed: Best Essential Oil Brands & Top Picks (consideration stage, 1.0x multiplier), Essential Oil Brand Comparisons (evaluation stage, 1.25x multiplier), and Essential Oil Pricing & Cost Evaluation (decision stage, 1.5x multiplier).
  • Raw AI responses were captured and then classified by company presence, sentiment, and recommendation rank.
  • A mention is recorded when a company appears in an AI-generated response, regardless of sentiment or recommendation status.
  • A valid recommendation is a positive, shortlist-quality or ranked recommendation. Neutral mentions, cautionary mentions, and comparison-anchor mentions are not counted as valid recommendations.
  • Cluster labels are inherited from the LLM Authority Index taxonomy and are consistent with observed prompt intent.
  • Limitations: This is a point-in-time benchmark. AI outputs can change as models update and source material evolves. Modeled values are estimates based on the valuation model described in the dataset; they are not revenue, pipeline, or booked sales. Only 3 of 10 total clusters are included in this public analysis.

This is an independent public analysis by CiteWorks Studio / LLM Authority Index. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Edens Garden unless explicitly stated.

How AI Is Reshaping Essential Oil Buyer Shortlists

AI-led discovery is changing how essential oil buyers evaluate brands before they visit a website or read a review. The benchmark data shows that being mentioned in an AI response is not the same as being recommended, and the gap between visibility and recommendation-stage influence can be significant even for strong challenger brands.

CiteWorks Studio maps where a brand appears, where competitors are recommended instead, which prompts carry the most commercial risk, which sources are shaping AI answers, and what changes to citation architecture and content structure are needed to improve recommendation-stage visibility. An AI Visibility Audit or AI Company Discovery Report surfaces a brand's full recommendation footprint across the clusters and platforms that matter most to buyers.

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT