CiteWorks Studio

NYU Langone Fertility AI Market Strategy Report - Fertility Clinics

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
9 minutes read

Key Takeaways

  • NYU Langone Fertility earned 12.95% valid recommendation coverage and converted 67.19% of mentions into recommendations, indicating efficient recommendation performance when surfaced.
  • The brand posted the strongest sentiment in the tracked set at 0.84, with 54 positive mentions, 10 neutral mentions, and no negative mentions.
  • Its main weakness is first-position conversion: a 10.84% top-three rate translated into just a 1.51% rank-one recommendation rate, trailing CCRM Fertility and RMA Network.
  • Perplexity was the strongest platform for rank-one performance, while Google AI Mode showed the clearest gap, with shortlist visibility but very limited first-choice recommendations.

Answer Capsule

NYU Langone Fertility holds a narrow but high-quality recommendation position in the Fertility Clinics AI market, with valid recommendation coverage of 12.95% in September 2026. The brand converts presence into positive framing more efficiently than any tracked competitor, posting a net sentiment score of 0.84 with zero negative mentions across 64 total appearances. Its clearest weakness is rank-one conversion, where it captures first-position recommendations in only 1.51% of qualified observations despite a top-three rate of 10.84%. The clearest opportunity is converting its strong positive framing and top-three placement into more frequent first-choice recommendations, particularly on platforms where it already holds rank-one strength.

Who This Report Is For

This report is for marketing, growth, and patient acquisition leaders at NYU Langone Fertility who need to understand how AI systems currently recommend the brand relative to fertility clinic competitors.

Report Card

Field

Value

Report type

AI Company Market Strategy Report

Target company

NYU Langone Fertility

Category / market studied

Fertility Clinics

Reporting month

September 2026

AI platforms tracked

6 (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode)

Public high-intent clusters

3

AI observations analyzed

332

Competitors tracked

10

Executive Summary

Questions This Section Answers

  • How does NYU Langone Fertility's recommendation presence compare with its framing quality?
  • Where does the brand show its weakest recommendation signal, and which competitors outperform it there?

NYU Langone Fertility occupies a distinctive position in the September 2026 Fertility Clinics benchmark: it is present less often than the category leaders but is framed more positively when it does appear. The brand recorded 64 mentions across 332 qualified observations, a raw mention presence rate of 19.28%, yet converted those mentions into 43 valid recommendations for a coverage rate of 12.95%. That conversion efficiency, paired with a net sentiment score of 0.84, indicates that AI systems that surface NYU Langone Fertility tend to describe it favorably.

The brand's strongest cluster is Best IVF Clinics & Top Fertility Centers, which accounts for all qualified observations in the dataset. Within that cluster, NYU Langone Fertility holds a top-three rate of 10.84% and an average recommended rank of 2.7 when it earns rank-eligible placement. Its weakest signal is rank-one conversion: only 1.51% of all qualified observations result in NYU Langone Fertility being named first, a rate well below CCRM Fertility's 10.54% and RMA Network's 3.92%.

Platform-level data shows NYU Langone Fertility performs best on Perplexity, where it achieves a 13.33% rank-one rate and a 26.67% positive visibility rate. The clearest platform gap is on Google AI Mode, where the brand holds a 13.33% top-three rate but converts only 1.11% of observations into rank-one recommendations. The benchmark shows a brand with strong positive framing and solid top-three presence that has not yet converted that standing into first-choice status at scale.

What NYU Langone Fertility Is Winning

NYU Langone Fertility holds the strongest net sentiment score in the tracked competitor set at 0.84, built on 54 positive mentions, 10 neutral mentions, and zero negative mentions. No other tracked brand approaches this framing quality, with the next closest competitor, RMA Network, at 0.67.

The brand also demonstrates efficient presence-to-recommendation conversion. With 64 mentions producing 43 valid recommendations, NYU Langone Fertility converts 67.19% of its mentions into recommendations. This is the strongest conversion efficiency among brands with meaningful presence levels and indicates that when AI systems reference the brand, they typically recommend it rather than merely listing it.

On Perplexity, NYU Langone Fertility achieves its strongest platform performance with a 13.33% rank-one rate and a 13.33% top-three rate across 15 observations. This platform-specific strength shows the brand can win first-position placement when the right evidence conditions exist.

Where NYU Langone Fertility Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps

NYU Langone Fertility's most significant gap is rank-one conversion. Despite a top-three rate of 10.84%, the brand converts only 1.51% of qualified observations into first-position recommendations. CCRM Fertility, by comparison, converts 10.54% of observations into rank-one recommendations, a sevenfold advantage. This pattern indicates NYU Langone Fertility appears in recommendation shortlists but is rarely positioned as the definitive first choice.

The brand also trails on raw presence. At 19.28%, NYU Langone Fertility appears in fewer than one in five qualified observations, compared with CCRM Fertility at 57.23% and Shady Grove Fertility at 45.18%. While the brand's positive framing is exceptional, its narrower presence limits the total recommendation surface it can capture.

Google AI Mode represents a specific platform gap. NYU Langone Fertility holds a 13.33% top-three rate on this surface, its strongest top-three performance of any platform, yet converts only 1.11% of observations into rank-one recommendations. The brand is being shortlisted on Google AI Mode but is not winning the top position when it appears.

Biggest Opportunity

The clearest opportunity for NYU Langone Fertility is converting its existing top-three presence into rank-one recommendations on Google AI Mode. The brand already achieves a 13.33% top-three rate on this platform, the highest of any surface in its portfolio, but its rank-one rate sits at just 1.11%. Closing this gap would move the brand from shortlist contender to first-choice recommendation on the platform where it already has the strongest placement foundation.

Competitive Landscape

Questions This Section Answers

  • Where does NYU Langone Fertility rank among tracked fertility clinics on top-three and rank-one recommendation rates?
  • Which competitors hold the strongest recommendation-stage positions in this market?

CCRM Fertility holds dominant recommendation-stage strength in the Fertility Clinics category, while NYU Langone Fertility sits in the middle of the tracked field with strong positive framing but limited first-choice conversion.

Brand

Top-3 rate

Rank-1 rate

Avg recommended rank

Sentiment

CCRM Fertility

18.37%

10.54%

2.40

0.5789

Shady Grove Fertility

13.25%

2.41%

3.03

0.56

NYU Langone Fertility

10.84%

1.51%

2.70

0.8438

RMA Network

10.84%

3.92%

3.39

0.6667

Pacific Fertility Center

4.52%

0.90%

3.04

0.3919

Spring Fertility

4.22%

1.20%

3.33

0.625

Kindbody

3.31%

0.30%

3.52

0.5319

Illume Fertility

0.30%

0.00%

5.00

0.0541

Boston IVF

0.00%

0.00%

5.33

0.5455

US Fertility

0.00%

0.00%

N/A

0.00

Average recommended rank covers rank-eligible recommendations only.

NYU Langone Fertility matches RMA Network on top-three rate at 10.84% but trails significantly on rank-one conversion, with RMA Network capturing first position more than twice as often. The brand's average recommended rank of 2.70 is the second strongest in the field, indicating that when NYU Langone Fertility is recommended, it tends to appear high in the list.

Prompt Evidence

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which platform-specific prompts produced NYU Langone Fertility's strongest and weakest recommendation outcomes?

Perplexity / Best IVF Clinics & Top Fertility Centers Prompt: "best fertility clinic" Result: NYU Langone Fertility appeared as a rank-one recommendation, demonstrating its strongest platform-specific performance.

Google AI Mode / Best IVF Clinics & Top Fertility Centers Prompt: "top fertility centers" Result: NYU Langone Fertility appeared in the top three in 13.33% of observations but rarely held the first position, showing shortlist presence without first-choice conversion.

ChatGPT / Best IVF Clinics & Top Fertility Centers Prompt: "ivf clinic recommendations" Result: NYU Langone Fertility earned a 12.50% valid recommendation coverage rate with a 10.00% top-three rate, appearing as a consistent secondary recommendation behind CCRM Fertility.

What CiteWorks Studio Would Do Next

Questions This Section Answers

  • What phased actions are recommended to close the gap between NYU Langone Fertility's top-three presence and rank-one conversion?

Phase 1: AI Market Discovery Audit Map the specific prompts where NYU Langone Fertility earns top-three placement but loses rank-one position, identifying which competitors capture the first-choice slot.

Phase 2: Recommendation Readiness Plan Strengthen the owned content layer around the brand's clinical outcomes, research affiliations, and academic medical center positioning to give AI systems clearer first-choice signals.

Phase 3: Owned Answer Layer Buildout Develop authoritative pages targeting high-intent fertility clinic prompts where the brand currently appears in shortlists but not as the primary recommendation.

Phase 4: Citation / Authority Layer Development Expand the public evidence layer that AI systems can retrieve, focusing on sources that support first-choice recommendation framing rather than general listing mentions.

Phase 5: Monthly AI Visibility and Recommendation Tracking Monitor rank-one conversion rates monthly, with particular attention to Google AI Mode where the top-three to rank-one gap is widest.

Why This Matters

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why does positive framing not automatically translate into first-choice recommendations for fertility clinics?

AI systems are increasingly shaping how prospective patients choose fertility clinics, and presence alone does not determine which brand gets selected. NYU Langone Fertility has built an exceptionally positive recommendation profile, but the benchmark shows that positive framing does not automatically translate into first-choice status. The brands winning rank-one recommendations are those whose public evidence layer consistently supports a definitive recommendation rather than a favorable mention.

The next move for NYU Langone Fertility is targeted correction of the prompt, page, and citation layers that separate its current top-three presence from the rank-one positions held by competitors. The positive sentiment foundation is already in place; the opportunity is converting that goodwill into first-choice recommendations at the moment of decision.

Core Metrics

Metric

Value

Mentions

64

Valid recommendations

43

Top 3 recommendation count

36

Rank #1 recommendation count

5

Average recommended rank

2.70

Positive mentions

54

Neutral mentions

10

Negative mentions

0

Raw mention presence rate

19.28%

Valid recommendation coverage

12.95%

Top 3 recommendation rate

10.84%

Rank #1 recommendation rate

1.51%

Net sentiment score

0.84

Strongest cluster by recommendation behavior

Best IVF Clinics & Top Fertility Centers

Strongest platform by recommendation behavior

Perplexity

Sentiment Score

Sentiment Score = (positive mentions × 1 + neutral mentions × 0 + negative mentions × -1) / total mentions

For NYU Langone Fertility, this calculation is (54 × 1 + 10 × 0 + 0 × -1) / 64, producing a score of 0.84.

This score matters because unclassified mention counts are misleading. A brand can appear frequently in AI responses while being framed negatively or neutrally, and that appearance does not translate into patient choice. Share of voice is a diagnostic metric, not a business KPI. A positive recommendation, neutral reference, cautionary mention, and competitor-displaced mention are not equal, and counting all mentions as wins is bad measurement. Classified sentiment is required before interpreting AI visibility, and NYU Langone Fertility's 0.84 score indicates that when the brand appears, it is almost always framed favorably.

Sentiment by Platform

Platform

Mentions

Positive

Neutral

Negative

Sentiment Score

Readout

ChatGPT

9

7

2

0

0.78

Positive, but sample too small

Copilot

8

7

1

0

0.88

Strongest public recommendation signal

Gemini

10

10

0

0

1.00

Positive, but sample too small

Perplexity

5

4

1

0

0.80

Positive, but sample too small

AI Overviews

17

13

4

0

0.76

Present as context, not recommendation

AI Mode

15

13

2

0

0.87

Present, but not recommendation-led

Methodology

  1. This report analyzes NYU Langone Fertility's AI recommendation visibility within the Fertility Clinics vertical using the LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery benchmark for September 2026.
  2. The reporting window covers September 2026, with comparative context drawn from July and August 2026 where available.
  3. Six AI/search surface families were tracked: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode.
  4. The benchmark began with 567 source prompt-surface observations, which produced 407 unique questions and 332 qualified benchmark observations after relevance and qualification filtering.
  5. The competitor universe includes 10 tracked fertility clinic brands: CCRM Fertility, Shady Grove Fertility, RMA Network, NYU Langone Fertility, Kindbody, Pacific Fertility Center, Spring Fertility, Boston IVF, Illume Fertility, and US Fertility.
  6. Public clusters used in this analysis include Best IVF Clinics & Top Fertility Centers, IVF Clinic Comparisons & Alternatives, and IVF Clinic Pricing & Fertility Treatment Costs. All 332 qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation intent class.
  7. Stage 0 extraction captured raw prompt-surface observations, which were then qualified through relevance screening and benchmark eligibility criteria before any brand-level metrics were calculated.
  8. A mention is defined as any qualified observation where the brand appears at all, regardless of context or framing.
  9. A valid recommendation is defined as a qualified observation where the brand receives an explicit positive recommendation, distinct from a neutral reference, cautionary mention, or listing-only appearance.
  10. Limitations: The public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking performance, or social media mention volume. Small-count movements may not indicate durable patterns, and the benchmark records changes in AI recommendation behavior without establishing causation.

Get Your AI Visibility Audit

Understanding where your brand appears in AI-generated recommendations is the first step toward winning more first-choice placements. An AI visibility audit can show you which prompts surface your brand, which competitors are displacing you, and where your public evidence layer needs strengthening. For fertility clinic marketing leaders, this intelligence is becoming as important as traditional search rankings for patient acquisition.

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

What Is AI Citation Intelligence?
AI citation intelligence is the process of measuring where AI platforms source their information and how frequently a brand is mentioned or referenced in AI-generated responses. Because LLMs synthesize across multiple sources, the sites and brands that appear repeatedly tend to influence how a topic or company is framed. This practice focuses on identifying which sources shape AI outputs and tracking brand visibility across different AI systems.
What Is Citation Architecture?
Citation architecture describes the set of sources that consistently inform how AI systems talk about a brand, product, or topic. LLMs draw from websites, articles, forums, and public discussion, and the sources they rely on most often become the backbone of their answers. Building strong citation architecture means ensuring that accurate, credible, high authority sources are the ones most likely to shape the way AI tools summarize and recommend a brand.
What Is Generative Engine Optimization?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of improving the chances that AI systems use and cite your brand or content when generating answers. While traditional SEO is centered on ranking pages in search results, GEO focuses on how LLMs retrieve, interpret, and combine information when responding to a question. The objective is to strengthen the content and sources AI systems rely on, so your brand is treated as a trusted reference in AI responses.
What Is AI Share of Voice?
AI share of voice tracks how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers compared with competitors in the same category. It reflects visibility across AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Monitoring AI share of voice helps organizations see whether AI systems consistently include and recommend their brand for key queries or whether competitor brands are showing up more often.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT