CiteWorks Studio

Marcus by Goldman Sachs AI Market Strategy Report — Certificate of Deposits

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
3 minutes read

On this report

Key Takeaways

  • Marcus by Goldman Sachs is highly visible in AI answers, but visibility does not always translate into being recommended.
  • Its strongest performance is in broad online banking discovery, where it is more likely to be shortlisted.
  • CD rate and comparison prompts are the clearest gaps, especially when AI systems prioritize current yield evidence.
  • The main opportunity is to strengthen rate, term, trust, and comparison-ready evidence so Marcus converts more mentions into recommendations.

This is an independent public analysis by CiteWorks Studio / LLM Authority Index. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Marcus by Goldman Sachs unless explicitly stated.

Answer Capsule

Marcus by Goldman Sachs appears in 375 of 1,013 AI observations and earns 177 valid recommendations. It is highly visible, but visibility is not the same as being chosen.

Its strongest position is broad online banking and deposit-account discovery. Its clearest gap is conversion in rate-led and comparison-style moments, where competitors can displace Marcus when AI systems prioritize current yield evidence.

The biggest opportunity is to strengthen recommendation readiness around CD-rate, comparison, and term-specific prompts.

Who This Report Is For

This report is for banking CMOs, deposit-product leaders, growth teams, communications teams, fintech strategists, and agency partners who need to understand whether AI systems merely mention a bank or recommend it when consumers compare CD rates, online accounts, and savings products.

Report Card

Field

Value

Report type

AI Market Strategy Report

Target company

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

Category

Certificate of Deposits

Reporting month

May 2026

AI platforms tracked

6

Public high-intent clusters

3

AI observations analyzed

1,013

Competitors tracked

Ally Bank, Barclays, Bread Savings, Capital One, CIT Bank, Popular Direct, Quontic Bank, Synchrony Bank

Executive Summary

Marcus by Goldman Sachs appears in 375 of 1,013 observations and records 177 valid recommendations. That is a strong presence base, but its recommendation-stage rates show a more contested market: 8.0% top-3 rate and 4.15% rank-1 rate.

Best Online Banking Solutions is the strongest cluster, with 494 observations, a 12.96% top-3 rate, and a 7.09% rank-1 rate. That is where Marcus is most likely to move from being named to being shortlisted.

CD Rate & Deposit Pricing Research is weaker. Across 383 observations, Marcus records a 3.13% top-3 rate and a 1.04% rank-1 rate, which points to displacement when AI answers become rate-led.

Platform performance is uneven. ChatGPT is the strongest rank-1 surface, while Google AI Mode gives Marcus broad positive visibility but less first-place conversion.

Sentiment is favorable overall: 235 positive mentions, 139 neutral mentions, and 1 negative mention. The issue is not basic reputation; it is converting trusted visibility into higher shortlist positions.

What Marcus by Goldman Sachs Is Winning

Marcus is winning broad eligibility. AI systems repeatedly recognize it as a credible online banking, savings, and CD-related option.

The strongest proof is Best Online Banking Solutions. Marcus earns its highest positive visibility, top-3 rate, rank-1 rate, and average recommended rank in that cluster.

Marcus also benefits from simple, trusted-brand framing. In prompt evidence, it is often described as reliable, no-frills, or easy to evaluate, which gives it a strong base in consumer-facing deposit decisions.

Where Marcus by Goldman Sachs Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps

The largest gap is rate-led conversion. Marcus appears in CD-rate prompts, but it often lands outside the first position when AI systems elevate institutions with stronger current-rate evidence.

Comparison and pricing prompts are also softer than discovery. Banking & Deposit Account Comparisons shows a 3.68% top-3 rate, while CD Rate & Deposit Pricing Research shows a 3.13% top-3 rate.

Ally Bank is the clearest tracked competitor above Marcus on recommendation-stage rates. Ally records a 15.99% top-3 rate and a 9.08% rank-1 rate, compared with Marcus at 8.0% and 4.15%.

Biggest Opportunity

Marcus has enough recognition to compete; the opportunity is to turn recognition into recommendation. The priority is to improve how AI systems validate Marcus in CD-rate, best-bank-for-CD, online deposit comparison, and pricing-style prompts.

That means strengthening the evidence layer around current rates, term options, trust, ease of opening, and comparison-ready positioning.

Competitive Landscape

Recommendation strength is concentrated among a few recurring online banking and deposit competitors. Ordered by top-3 rate, Marcus sits behind Ally Bank but ahead of the rest of the tracked competitor set.

Brand

Top-3 rate

Rank-1 rate

Avg recommended rank

Sentiment

Ally Bank

16.0%

9.1%

1.62

0.70

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

8.0%

4.2%

1.73

0.62

Capital One

5.9%

3.0%

1.82

0.57

Synchrony Bank

3.5%

1.7%

1.69

0.48

Bread Savings

2.7%

1.4%

1.70

0.54

CIT Bank

1.8%

0.5%

2.00

0.49

Popular Direct

1.4%

0.7%

1.79

0.57

Quontic Bank

1.0%

0.6%

1.60

0.60

Barclays

0.1%

0.0%

2.00

0.45

Average recommended rank covers rank-eligible recommendations only.

Prompt Evidence

ChatGPT / Best Online Banking SolutionsWhat is the best bank to open a CD account? Result: Marcus by Goldman Sachs is ranked first and framed as the leader.

ChatGPT / Best Online Banking SolutionsWhat are the best 9-month CD rates? Result: Marcus appears as a valid recommendation but ranks fourth, behind Synchrony Bank, Seattle Bank, and Bask Bank.

ChatGPT / Best Online Banking SolutionsWho has the best CD rates online? Result: Marcus appears as a valid recommendation but ranks fifth, showing inclusion without top-slot control.

Google AI Mode / Best Online Banking SolutionsWhat bank has the best CD rates? Result: Marcus appears as a positive valid recommendation but outside the top five.

Copilot / Best Online Banking SolutionsWhat is the best bank to open a CD account? Result: Marcus appears as a neutral factual reference rather than a valid recommendation.

What CiteWorks Studio Would Do Next

Phase 1: AI Market Strategy Audit

Map the discovery, comparison, and pricing prompts where Marcus is present, displaced, or promoted across the six platforms.

Phase 2: Recommendation Readiness Plan

Prioritize the clusters where Marcus is visible but under-converting, especially CD Rate & Deposit Pricing Research and Banking & Deposit Account Comparisons.

Phase 3: Owned Answer Layer Buildout

Build answer-ready pages around CD term selection, rate context, account-opening simplicity, trust, and competitor comparisons.

Phase 4: Citation / Authority Layer Development

Strengthen the third-party evidence layer AI systems synthesize from, including finance-publisher comparisons, rate trackers, reviews, and account validation sources.

Phase 5: Monthly AI Visibility & Recommendation Tracking

Track movement from presence to recommendation over time, by platform, cluster, prompt type, and competitor set.

Why This Matters

Marcus by Goldman Sachs is already in the AI answer set. That is a start, not a finish.

In CD and deposit-account search, buyers often ask AI systems to narrow the market. A bank can be visible and still lose the recommendation moment if another institution is easier to validate as the best fit for the prompt.

For Marcus, the strategic task is not awareness repair. It is recommendation conversion: moving more prompts from mention to valid recommendation, from valid recommendation to top-3, and from top-3 to rank-1.

Core Metrics

Metric

Value

Mentions

375

Valid recommendations

177

Top 3 recommendation count

81

Rank #1 recommendation count

42

Average recommended rank

1.7284 (rank-eligible recommendations only; all three normalized clusters carried ranked positions)

Positive mentions

235

Neutral mentions

139

Negative mentions

1

Raw mention presence rate

37.02%

Valid recommendation coverage

17.47%

Top 3 recommendation rate

8.00%

Rank #1 recommendation rate

4.15%

Net sentiment score

0.6240

Sentiment & Recommendation by Platform

Platform

Positive visibility rate

Rank-1 rate

Readout

ChatGPT

37.4%

9.9%

Strongest rank-1 surface and broadest positive visibility

Copilot

7.1%

0.6%

Sparse positive visibility and limited first-place conversion

Gemini

3.9%

0.0%

Lowest positive visibility with no rank-1 conversion

Google AI Mode

33.6%

1.2%

Strong presence, but limited first-place conversion

Google AI Overviews

26.0%

7.8%

Solid rank-1 support relative to most surfaces

Perplexity

13.2%

2.9%

Moderate visibility with some rank-1 traction

Methodology

One-company report; all other tracked brands are competitors relative to Marcus by Goldman Sachs. Reporting month May 2026; dataset extracted May 20, 2026.

Six AI environments are tracked: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews. The packet contains 1,013 observations, which is the denominator for the reported rates.

The tracked competitor universe is Ally Bank, Barclays, Bread Savings, Capital One, CIT Bank, Popular Direct, Quontic Bank, and Synchrony Bank. Public clusters were normalized as Best Online Banking Solutions, Banking & Deposit Account Comparisons, and CD Rate & Deposit Pricing Research.

A mention counts when Marcus by Goldman Sachs appears in an AI answer. A valid recommendation requires positive, shortlist-quality inclusion rather than a neutral reference.

Per the dataset's methodology inputs, sentiment is scored as “negative = -1, neutral = 0, positive = 1.” Rank eligibility is defined as: “Only positive valid recommendations receive rank credit.”

This is a point-in-time packet. AI outputs shift with platform updates, prompt phrasing, geography, personalization, retrieval state, and source-ecosystem changes.

Request an AI Visibility Audit

CiteWorks Studio produces AI Market Strategy Reports showing where your brand appears, disappears, or gets recommended across ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews. Request an AI Visibility Audit.


/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT