CiteWorks Studio

Noochies! AI Market Strategy Report - Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
10 minutes read

Key Takeaways

  • Noochies! recorded 0 mentions and 0 valid recommendations across 421 qualified observations in September 2026.
  • The brand was absent from all six tracked platforms: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
  • This is a recommendation gap at the category-entry level, not a conversion or ranking issue within existing visibility.
  • Open Farm led the category at 66.75% valid recommendation coverage, highlighting the scale of Noochies!'s competitive gap.

Answer Capsule

Noochies! holds no recorded presence in the September 2026 LLM Authority Index benchmark for Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein, with 0.00% raw mention presence and 0.00% valid recommendation coverage across 421 qualified AI observations. The brand was not surfaced in any AI-generated recommendation, shortlist, or reference across six tracked platforms: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. This is a complete recommendation gap rather than a conversion problem. The benchmark shows Open Farm leading the category at 66.75% valid recommendation coverage, with the remaining nine tracked brands clustering between 0.00% and 24.47%. The clearest opportunity for Noochies! is foundational: establishing first mention and first valid recommendation in the category conversation.

Who This Report Is For

This report is for Noochies! leadership, brand strategy, and growth teams evaluating why the brand does not appear in AI-generated pet food recommendations and what foundational work is required to enter the category conversation.

Report Card

Field

Value

Report type

AI Company Market Strategy Report

Target company

Noochies!

Category / market studied

Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein

Reporting month

September 2026

AI platforms tracked

6 (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode)

Public high-intent clusters

1 active (Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food)

AI observations analyzed

421 qualified observations

Competitors tracked

9

Executive Summary

Noochies! recorded zero mentions, zero valid recommendations, zero top-three placements, and zero rank-one placements in the September 2026 LLM Authority Index benchmark for Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein. Across 421 qualified observations spanning six AI platforms, the brand was not surfaced in any AI-generated response, recommendation, shortlist, or reference. This is not a case of weak recommendation conversion or visibility without recommendation credit. It is complete absence from the category conversation.

The benchmark tracks ten brands in this vertical. Nine of them registered at least one mention. Noochies! is the only tracked brand with a 0.00% raw mention presence rate and a 0.00% valid recommendation coverage rate. The nearest comparable brand by coverage, Yora, holds 0.24% valid recommendation coverage with one valid recommendation across 421 observations. Even that minimal presence represents a meaningful gap relative to Noochies!.

The category leader, Open Farm, holds 66.75% valid recommendation coverage, appearing in 281 of 421 qualified observations as a valid recommendation. Freshpet holds second place at 24.47% coverage. The remaining brands with any presence cluster between 0.24% and 13.06%. Noochies! sits below all of them.

The benchmark's single active cluster, Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food, is a consideration-stage prompt set. All 421 qualified observations in September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation buyer-intent class, meaning every qualified prompt asked for a direct brand recommendation. Noochies! was not recommended in any of them.

No platform-level signal exists for Noochies! because the brand did not appear on any of the six tracked platforms. ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode all returned zero mentions for the brand. There is no strongest platform, no strongest cluster, and no framing signal to report because there is no classified mention data to analyze.

The benchmark methodology notes that small observation counts at the individual brand level should be interpreted with caution. For Noochies!, the observation count is zero. The finding is unambiguous: the brand has no measurable AI recommendation presence in this category as of September 2026.

What Noochies! Is Winning

Noochies! does not register any measurable wins in the September 2026 benchmark. The brand holds zero mentions, zero valid recommendations, zero top-three placements, zero rank-one placements, and zero sentiment-classified mentions across all six tracked AI platforms. There is no cluster where the brand outperforms, no platform where it appears, and no prompt type where it is surfaced. The absence is complete and consistent across every dimension the benchmark measures.

Where Noochies! Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps

The gap is total. Noochies! does not appear in any AI-generated recommendation, shortlist, or reference across 421 qualified observations in the Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein category. Every other tracked brand, including Yora at 0.24% coverage and Jiminy's at 0.48% top-three rate, registered at least one mention. Noochies! registered none.

The competitive displacement pattern is absolute. When AI systems generate recommendations for sustainable or alternative-protein pet food, they draw from a pool of nine brands. Noochies! is not in that pool. Open Farm captures 66.75% of valid recommendation coverage. Freshpet captures 24.47%. V-Dog captures 13.06%. Wild Earth captures 12.35%. Even brands with minimal presence, such as Yora and Jiminy's, appear in the recommendation set at least once. Noochies! appears zero times.

This absence spans all six platforms. ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode all returned zero mentions for Noochies! in September 2026. There is no platform where the brand has a foothold and no platform where it is closer to entering the conversation. The gap is uniform.

The benchmark's single active cluster, Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food, is a consideration-stage prompt set asking for direct brand recommendations. Noochies! was not recommended in any of the 421 qualified observations. The brand is not part of the buyer shortlist that AI systems construct when users ask for sustainable or alternative-protein pet food recommendations.

Biggest Opportunity

The single clearest opportunity for Noochies! is to establish first mention and first valid recommendation in the Brand Recommendation cluster. This is the only active cluster in the benchmark and the only prompt type where the brand can currently compete. The path from zero presence to first mention requires building the public evidence layer that AI systems draw from when generating recommendations: owned content that clearly positions the brand as a sustainable or alternative-protein pet food option, third-party citations and references that AI systems can retrieve, and structured information that makes the brand discoverable in category-level queries. The opportunity is foundational, not incremental. Noochies! is not optimizing an existing presence. It is creating one.

Competitive Landscape

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who leads the sustainable pet food and alternative protein category in AI recommendations, and how far ahead is Open Farm?
  • What do the top-3, rank-1, and average recommended rank metrics show about each tracked brand?
  • Where does Noochies! sit relative to the other nine tracked brands?

Open Farm holds dominant recommendation-stage strength in the Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein category, with Freshpet as the strongest challenger and V-Dog and Wild Earth forming a distant third tier. Noochies! holds no recommendation-stage presence and does not appear in the competitive set that AI systems draw from when generating recommendations.

Brand

Top-3 rate

Rank-1 rate

Avg recommended rank

Sentiment

Open Farm

24.94%

8.55%

3.31

0.9096

Freshpet

10.21%

3.80%

3.29

0.8151

V-Dog

8.31%

4.28%

1.93

0.9831

Wild Earth

8.31%

1.43%

2.28

0.9333

Petaluma

2.85%

0.71%

3.11

0.8846

PawCo Foods

1.66%

0.71%

3.63

1.0000

Earth Animal

0.48%

0.24%

2.33

0.8571

Jiminy's

0.48%

0.24%

2.00

0.6667

Yora

0.24%

0.00%

2.00

1.0000

Noochies!

0.00%

0.00%

N/A

0.0000

Average recommended rank covers rank-eligible recommendations only.

Noochies! sits at the bottom of the table with zero top-three rate, zero rank-one rate, no rank-eligible recommendations, and no classified sentiment. The brand does not appear in any recommendation position because it does not appear in any recommendation at all.

Prompt Evidence

Questions This Section Answers

  • What did AI platforms actually recommend when asked for the best sustainable or healthiest dog food?
  • Which brands appeared alongside Noochies!'s absence in specific prompts like 'best dog food' and 'best sustainable pet food'?

ChatGPT / Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food Prompt: "What is the healthiest dog food for a dog?" Result: Noochies! was not mentioned or recommended. Open Farm, Freshpet, and V-Dog appeared in the recommendation set.

Google AI Overviews / Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food Prompt: "best dog food brands" Result: Noochies! was not mentioned or recommended. Open Farm held the strongest presence with a 34.51% top-three rate on this platform.

Gemini / Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food Prompt: "best dog food" Result: Noochies! was not mentioned or recommended. Open Farm, V-Dog, and Petaluma appeared in the recommendation set.

Perplexity / Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food Prompt: "best sustainable pet food" Result: Noochies! was not mentioned or recommended. Open Farm and Freshpet dominated the recommendation set on this platform.

What CiteWorks Studio Would Do Next

Phase 1: AI Market Discovery Audit Map every prompt in the Brand Recommendation cluster where Noochies! is absent, identify which competitors are recommended instead, and document the evidence sources AI systems currently draw from in this category.

Phase 2: Recommendation Readiness Plan Define the brand positioning, category language, and proof points Noochies! needs to become eligible for AI-generated recommendations in sustainable and alternative-protein pet food queries.

Phase 3: Owned Answer Layer Buildout Create the owned content that directly answers the questions AI systems ask when generating recommendations: what the brand is, what it offers, why it qualifies as a sustainable or alternative-protein pet food option, and how it compares to the brands currently being recommended.

Phase 4: Citation / Authority Layer Development Build the third-party citation and reference footprint that AI systems retrieve when constructing recommendations, including industry sources, review platforms, and category-level references that establish Noochies! as a recognized option.

Phase 5: Monthly AI Visibility and Recommendation Tracking Monitor Noochies! presence, recommendation coverage, and placement across all six tracked platforms to measure progress from zero presence to first mention to first valid recommendation.

Why This Matters

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why is being absent from AI-generated recommendation shortlists a commercial problem for Noochies!?
  • What is the difference between having minimal presence and having zero presence in AI recommendations?

AI systems are now the first stop for buyers researching sustainable and alternative-protein pet food. When a shopper asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, or Google AI Overviews for the best sustainable dog food or the healthiest alternative-protein pet food, the AI system generates a recommendation shortlist. Noochies! is not on that shortlist. The brand does not appear in any AI-generated recommendation across 421 qualified observations in September 2026.

The gap between presence and recommendation is critical. Even brands with minimal presence, such as Yora at 0.24% coverage, appear in the recommendation set at least once. Noochies! appears zero times. The next move is not optimization. It is foundational: build the owned content, citation footprint, and category positioning that make the brand discoverable and recommendable in AI-generated answers. Without that foundation, the brand remains invisible at the exact moment buyers are forming their shortlist.

Core Metrics

Metric

Value

Mentions

0

Valid recommendations

0

Top 3 recommendation count

0

Rank #1 recommendation count

0

Average recommended rank

N/A

Positive mentions

0

Neutral mentions

0

Negative mentions

0

Raw mention presence rate

0.00%

Valid recommendation coverage

0.00%

Top 3 recommendation rate

0.00%

Rank #1 recommendation rate

0.00%

Net sentiment score

0.0000

Strongest cluster by recommendation behavior

None (no presence in any cluster)

Strongest platform by recommendation behavior

None (no presence on any platform)

Sentiment Score

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does Noochies!'s 0.0000 sentiment score mean neutral sentiment or something else?
  • Why does the report say share of voice is a diagnostic metric rather than a business KPI?

Sentiment Score = (positive mentions x 1 + neutral mentions x 0 + negative mentions x -1) / total mentions

Noochies! recorded zero mentions in September 2026. With zero positive, zero neutral, and zero negative mentions, the sentiment score is 0.0000. This is not a neutral sentiment score in the conventional sense. It reflects the absence of any mention, not a balance of positive and negative framing.

This distinction matters because unclassified mention counts are misleading. A brand with zero mentions does not have neutral sentiment. It has no sentiment because it has no presence. Share of voice is a diagnostic metric, not a business KPI. A positive recommendation, a neutral reference, a cautionary mention, and a competitor-displaced mention are not equal. Counting all mentions as wins is bad measurement. Classified sentiment is required before interpreting AI visibility. For Noochies!, there is no visibility to interpret.

Sentiment by Platform

Platform

Mentions

Positive

Neutral

Negative

Sentiment Score

Readout

ChatGPT

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Copilot

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Gemini

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Perplexity

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

AI Overviews

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

AI Mode

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Methodology

  1. This report is a benchmark-based analysis of Noochies! AI recommendation presence in the Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein category for September 2026. It is not a client implementation case study.
  2. The reporting window is September 2026. The benchmark compares September 2026 data to August 2026 baseline data where available.
  3. Six AI platforms were tracked: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six registered qualified observations in September 2026.
  4. The benchmark collected 800 prompt-surface observations in September 2026. After Stage 0 extraction and qualification, 421 observations remained as the public denominator for brand-level metrics.
  5. The competitor universe includes ten tracked brands: Open Farm, Freshpet, V-Dog, Wild Earth, Petaluma, PawCo Foods, Earth Animal, Jiminy's, Yora, and Noochies!.
  6. One public high-intent cluster was active in September 2026: Best Sustainable and Alternative Protein Pet Food (consideration stage). All 421 qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation buyer-intent class.
  7. Stage 0 extraction captured the query, AI surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources.
  8. A mention is defined as any appearance of the brand in an AI-generated response, regardless of context or framing.
  9. A valid recommendation is defined as a genuine recommendation or shortlist inclusion, not a neutral reference, cautionary mention, comparison anchor, or listed-only appearance.
  10. Noochies! recorded zero mentions and zero valid recommendations across all 421 qualified observations and all six platforms. The brand does not appear in any AI-generated response in this benchmark.
  11. The benchmark's public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
  12. Small observation counts at the individual brand level should be interpreted with caution. For Noochies!, the observation count is zero, making the absence finding unambiguous.

See Where Your Brand Stands in AI Recommendations

The public benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level AI visibility audit maps your brand's specific presence, recommendation patterns, and competitive position across every tracked platform and prompt cluster. For brands with zero presence, the audit identifies the foundational content, citation, and positioning work required to enter the AI recommendation set.

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

What Is AI Citation Intelligence?
AI citation intelligence is the process of measuring where AI platforms source their information and how frequently a brand is mentioned or referenced in AI-generated responses. Because LLMs synthesize across multiple sources, the sites and brands that appear repeatedly tend to influence how a topic or company is framed. This practice focuses on identifying which sources shape AI outputs and tracking brand visibility across different AI systems.
What Is Citation Architecture?
Citation architecture describes the set of sources that consistently inform how AI systems talk about a brand, product, or topic. LLMs draw from websites, articles, forums, and public discussion, and the sources they rely on most often become the backbone of their answers. Building strong citation architecture means ensuring that accurate, credible, high authority sources are the ones most likely to shape the way AI tools summarize and recommend a brand.
What Is Generative Engine Optimization?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of improving the chances that AI systems use and cite your brand or content when generating answers. While traditional SEO is centered on ranking pages in search results, GEO focuses on how LLMs retrieve, interpret, and combine information when responding to a question. The objective is to strengthen the content and sources AI systems rely on, so your brand is treated as a trusted reference in AI responses.
What Is AI Share of Voice?
AI share of voice tracks how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers compared with competitors in the same category. It reflects visibility across AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Monitoring AI share of voice helps organizations see whether AI systems consistently include and recommend their brand for key queries or whether competitor brands are showing up more often.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT