CiteWorks Studio

Craft Concierge AI Market Strategy Report - TRT Clinics

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
11 minutes read

Key Takeaways

  • Craft Concierge appeared in 2 of 218 qualified TRT clinic responses, for a 0.92% raw mention presence rate.
  • The brand received zero valid recommendations, zero top-three placements, and zero rank-one placements across all tracked responses.
  • Its only visibility came from one neutral mention on Google AI Mode and one positive mention on Google AI Overviews, with no mentions on ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, or Perplexity.
  • The main gap is a weak public evidence layer, while competitors such as Hone Health, Defy Medical, Maximus, and Marek Health dominate recommendation coverage.

Answer Capsule

Craft Concierge is effectively absent from AI-generated recommendations in the TRT Clinics category. In September 2026, the brand appeared in just 0.92% of qualified observations and received zero valid recommendations across 218 qualified answers. Its only measurable presence came through a single neutral mention on Google AI Mode and one positive mention on Google AI Overviews, neither of which converted into a shortlist placement. The clearest opportunity is foundational: establishing enough public evidence for AI systems to recognize Craft Concierge as a viable TRT clinic option at all.

Who This Report Is For

This report is for Craft Concierge leadership, marketing teams, and growth strategists evaluating why the brand does not surface in AI-generated TRT clinic recommendations and what structural gaps need to be addressed.

Report Card

Field

Value

Report type

AI Company Market Strategy Report

Target company

Craft Concierge

Category / market studied

TRT Clinics

Reporting month

September 2026

AI platforms tracked

6 (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode)

Public high-intent clusters

3

AI observations analyzed

218

Competitors tracked

9

Executive Summary

Craft Concierge holds no meaningful position in AI-generated TRT clinic recommendations. Across 218 qualified observations in September 2026, the brand appeared in only 2 responses, producing a raw mention presence rate of 0.92%. It received zero valid recommendations, zero top-three placements, and zero rank-one placements. Its net sentiment score of 0.5 reflects one positive and one neutral mention, a sample too small to carry strategic weight.

The benchmark data shows that Craft Concierge's presence is concentrated entirely on Google surfaces. One neutral mention appeared on Google AI Mode and one positive mention on Google AI Overviews. The brand registered no mentions on ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, or Perplexity. This means four of the six tracked AI platforms have no record of Craft Concierge in any TRT clinic response.

The category's recommendation landscape is dominated by Hone Health at 42.66% valid recommendation coverage and Defy Medical at 40.83%. Maximus follows at 27.52%, with Marek Health at 16.97%. These four brands absorb the overwhelming majority of recommendation placements. Craft Concierge, by contrast, holds a 0.00% valid recommendation coverage rate.

The single cluster measured in this benchmark, Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers, accounts for all 218 qualified observations. Craft Concierge's two mentions both fell within this cluster, but neither produced a recommendation outcome. The brand was referenced without being shortlisted.

The benchmark's public series does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing and Value or Multi-Brand Comparison clusters. This means the data cannot show whether Craft Concierge would surface in cost-focused or head-to-head comparison prompts. However, given the brand's near-total absence from the primary recommendation cluster, the gap is unlikely to be isolated to one prompt type.

The clearest structural issue is that Craft Concierge lacks the public evidence layer that AI systems appear to draw from when constructing TRT clinic recommendations. Competitors with strong recommendation coverage, including Hone Health, Defy Medical, and Maximus, all show substantially higher presence rates and positive mention volumes. Craft Concierge's two total mentions across 218 observations indicate that AI systems have very little material to work with when the brand's name enters a prompt.

What Craft Concierge Is Winning

Questions This Section Answers

  • Where does Craft Concierge actually appear in AI TRT clinic responses?
  • What do its positive and neutral mentions say about how AI systems frame the brand?

Craft Concierge has almost no measurable wins in the September 2026 benchmark. The brand recorded one positive mention on Google AI Overviews, which produced a net sentiment score of 1.0 on that platform. This indicates that when the brand does appear, the framing is not negative.

The brand also recorded one neutral mention on Google AI Mode, contributing to a net sentiment score of 0.5 on that platform. No negative mentions appeared on any platform.

These are not recommendation wins. They are presence signals with positive or neutral framing. The brand is not being criticized in AI responses, but it is also not being recommended. The absence of negative sentiment is a baseline condition, not a competitive advantage.

Where Craft Concierge Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why does Craft Concierge get mentioned without being recommended?
  • Which platforms and competitors show the most severe visibility gap for Craft Concierge?

Craft Concierge is present but not chosen. The brand appeared in two qualified observations and received zero valid recommendations. This is the definition of visibility without recommendation conversion.

The gap is most severe when compared to the category leaders. Hone Health appeared in 77.06% of qualified observations and received 93 valid recommendations. Defy Medical appeared in 47.71% and received 89 valid recommendations. Maximus appeared in 36.70% and received 60 valid recommendations. Craft Concierge appeared in 0.92% and received zero.

The brand is also absent from four of the six tracked AI platforms. ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity produced no Craft Concierge mentions in any qualified TRT clinic response. This means the brand has no recommendation footprint on the platforms where many buyers conduct initial research.

Even on the platforms where Craft Concierge does appear, the brand does not convert. Google AI Mode recorded one neutral mention with no recommendation. Google AI Overviews recorded one positive mention with no recommendation. The brand is being referenced as context, not as a shortlist option.

The competitive displacement pattern is clear. When AI systems construct TRT clinic recommendations, they draw from a pool of brands with established public evidence. Craft Concierge is not in that pool. The brands that are, including Hone Health, Defy Medical, Maximus, and Marek Health, hold recommendation coverage rates between 16.97% and 42.66%. Craft Concierge holds 0.00%.

Biggest Opportunity

Questions This Section Answers

  • What recommendation outcome should Craft Concierge prioritize first to establish an AI presence?
  • What evidence layer does Craft Concierge need to move from reference to recommendation?

The single highest-impact opportunity for Craft Concierge is to establish a valid recommendation presence in the Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers cluster. This cluster accounts for all 218 qualified observations in the current benchmark and represents the primary discovery prompt type for buyers researching TRT clinics.

The path from reference to recommendation requires building the public evidence layer that AI systems appear to draw from. This includes structured, retrievable content that clearly positions Craft Concierge as a TRT clinic option, third-party citations that reinforce the brand's category relevance, and consistent presence across the platforms where the brand is currently absent.

The immediate goal is not to match Hone Health's 42.66% coverage rate. It is to move from zero valid recommendations to a measurable, repeatable recommendation presence. Even a small number of valid recommendations would represent a meaningful shift from the current state.

Competitive Landscape

Questions This Section Answers

  • Where does Craft Concierge rank against Hone Health, Defy Medical, Maximus, and other TRT clinics?
  • Which competitors dominate top-three and rank-one recommendation placements in the TRT Clinics category?

Hone Health and Defy Medical hold the strongest recommendation-stage positions in the TRT Clinics category, with Maximus and Marek Health forming a second tier. Craft Concierge sits at the bottom of the tracked set with no valid recommendations and minimal presence.

Brand

Top-3 rate

Rank-1 rate

Avg recommended rank

Sentiment

Hone Health

33.94%

8.26%

2.21

0.6726

Maximus

20.64%

9.63%

2.13

0.8750

Defy Medical

19.72%

3.67%

3.24

0.9135

Marek Health

9.17%

1.38%

3.07

0.8163

Henry Meds

5.50%

0.46%

3.25

0.6444

Fountain TRT

3.21%

0.46%

4.00

0.6452

Renew Vitality

0.92%

0.00%

4.80

0.4615

Low T Center

0.46%

0.46%

3.33

0.2667

BioTE

0.00%

0.00%

5.00

0.0909

Craft Concierge

0.00%

0.00%

N/A

0.5000

Average recommended rank covers rank-eligible recommendations only.

Craft Concierge ranks last in the tracked set on top-three rate and rank-one rate, tied with BioTE at zero. The brand's sentiment score of 0.5 is based on two mentions, making it statistically fragile compared to the larger samples behind Hone Health, Defy Medical, and Maximus.

Prompt Evidence

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which TRT clinic prompts produced mentions of Craft Concierge, and what was the brand outcome?
  • Which prompts did Craft Concierge fail to appear in across the tracked AI platforms?

Google AI Mode / Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers Prompt: "trt clinic" Result: Craft Concierge received a neutral mention with no recommendation placement.

Google AI Overviews / Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers Prompt: "best testosterone replacement therapy" Result: Craft Concierge received a positive mention but was not included in the recommendation shortlist.

ChatGPT / Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers Prompt: "online doctors that prescribe testosterone" Result: No Craft Concierge mention appeared in the response.

Perplexity / Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers Prompt: "best place to buy peptides online" Result: No Craft Concierge mention appeared in the response.

What CiteWorks Studio Would Do Next

Phase 1: AI Market Discovery Audit Map every prompt where Craft Concierge appears, every prompt where competitors are recommended instead, and the exact platform and cluster distribution of the brand's current presence.

Phase 2: Recommendation Readiness Plan Identify the specific evidence gaps that prevent AI systems from converting Craft Concierge mentions into valid recommendations, and prioritize the content and citation assets needed to close them.

Phase 3: Owned Answer Layer Buildout Develop structured, retrievable content that clearly positions Craft Concierge as a TRT clinic option across the prompt types where the brand is currently absent.

Phase 4: Citation and Authority Layer Development Build the third-party citation footprint that AI systems appear to draw from when constructing TRT clinic recommendations, focusing on the source types that support the category leaders.

Phase 5: Monthly AI Visibility and Recommendation Tracking Track Craft Concierge's presence rate, valid recommendation coverage, top-three rate, and rank-one rate month over month to measure progress against the September 2026 baseline.

Why This Matters

AI-generated recommendations are becoming a primary discovery channel for buyers researching TRT clinics. When a buyer asks ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode for the best TRT clinic, the response shapes their shortlist before they visit a single website. Craft Concierge is not in that shortlist.

Presence alone is not enough. Craft Concierge appeared in two qualified observations but received zero valid recommendations. The brand was mentioned without being chosen. This is the gap that matters: not whether AI systems know Craft Concierge exists, but whether they recommend it when buyers ask.

The next move is targeted correction of the prompt, page, and citation layers that determine whether AI systems treat Craft Concierge as a recommendation-worthy option. The benchmark shows where the brand stands. The work ahead is building the evidence layer that moves it from reference to recommendation.

Core Metrics

Metric

Value

Mentions

2

Valid recommendations

0

Top 3 recommendation count

0

Rank #1 recommendation count

0

Average recommended rank

N/A

Positive mentions

1

Neutral mentions

1

Negative mentions

0

Raw mention presence rate

0.92%

Valid recommendation coverage

0.00%

Top 3 recommendation rate

0.00%

Rank #1 recommendation rate

0.00%

Net sentiment score

0.5000

Strongest cluster by recommendation behavior

Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers (no valid recommendations)

Strongest platform by recommendation behavior

Google AI Overviews (1 positive mention, 0 recommendations)

Sentiment Score

Sentiment Score = (positive mentions × 1 + neutral mentions × 0 + negative mentions × -1) / total mentions

For Craft Concierge in September 2026: (1 × 1 + 1 × 0 + 0 × -1) / 2 = 0.5000

This score matters because unclassified mention counts are misleading. A brand with two mentions and a sentiment score of 0.5 looks different from a brand with two mentions and a sentiment score of -0.5. Craft Concierge's score indicates that the brand is not being criticized, but it also does not indicate recommendation strength.

Share of voice is a diagnostic metric, not a business KPI. A positive recommendation, a neutral reference, a cautionary mention, and a competitor-displaced mention are not equal. Craft Concierge's two mentions are neutral and positive references, not recommendations. Counting them as wins would be bad measurement.

Classified sentiment is required before interpreting AI visibility. Craft Concierge's sentiment score of 0.5 is based on a sample of two mentions. This is too small to draw firm conclusions. The score should be read as directional, not definitive.

Sentiment by Platform

Questions This Section Answers

  • How does Craft Concierge's AI sentiment differ between Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode?
  • Which AI platforms recorded no Craft Concierge presence at all?

Platform

Mentions

Positive

Neutral

Negative

Sentiment Score

Readout

ChatGPT

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Copilot

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Gemini

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Perplexity

0

0

0

0

N/A

No public presence in this packet

Google AI Overviews

1

1

0

0

1.0000

Positive, but sample too small

Google AI Mode

1

0

1

0

0.0000

Present as context, not recommendation

Methodology

  1. This report is a benchmark-based analysis of Craft Concierge's position in AI-generated TRT clinic recommendations. It is not a client result and does not imply that CiteWorks Studio caused any observed outcome.
  2. The reporting window is September 2026. The benchmark series began in July 2026 and includes monthly measurements for July, August, and September 2026.
  3. Six AI platforms were tracked: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. All six produced qualified observations in September 2026.
  4. The September 2026 collection began with 800 prompt-surface observations. After qualification, 218 observations were retained for analysis. The public metrics use these 218 qualified observations as the denominator.
  5. The competitor universe includes 10 tracked brands: BioTE, Craft Concierge, Defy Medical, Fountain TRT, Henry Meds, Hone Health, Low T Center, Marek Health, Maximus, and Renew Vitality.
  6. The benchmark used three public high-intent clusters: Best TRT Clinics and Top Testosterone Therapy Providers, TRT Clinic Comparisons and Testosterone Therapy Alternatives, and TRT Clinic Pricing, Cost and Affordability. Only the first cluster produced qualified observations in September 2026.
  7. Stage 0 extraction retained the query, AI surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources.
  8. A mention is defined as any appearance of a brand name in a qualified AI response, regardless of whether the brand was recommended.
  9. A valid recommendation is defined as a clear, actionable recommendation of a brand within a qualified AI response. Neutral references, cautionary mentions, and comparison anchors are not counted as valid recommendations unless the dataset explicitly marks them as such.
  10. Average recommended rank covers rank-eligible recommendations only. Craft Concierge received no rank-eligible recommendations in September 2026, so its average recommended rank is N/A.
  11. The benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private or sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
  12. Small-count movement: Craft Concierge operates on fewer than five valid recommendations. A change of one or two answers would materially move its percentages. Month-to-month shifts should be read with that base in mind.

See Where AI Is Recommending Your Brand

The public benchmark shows where Craft Concierge stands in AI-generated TRT clinic recommendations. A company-level AI visibility audit can show why the brand is not being recommended, which competitors are capturing the shortlist placements, and what evidence gaps need to be addressed. The audit maps prompt-level patterns, platform-specific gaps, and citation-source opportunities into a prioritized strategy for building recommendation-stage visibility.

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

What Is AI Citation Intelligence?
AI citation intelligence is the process of measuring where AI platforms source their information and how frequently a brand is mentioned or referenced in AI-generated responses. Because LLMs synthesize across multiple sources, the sites and brands that appear repeatedly tend to influence how a topic or company is framed. This practice focuses on identifying which sources shape AI outputs and tracking brand visibility across different AI systems.
What Is Citation Architecture?
Citation architecture describes the set of sources that consistently inform how AI systems talk about a brand, product, or topic. LLMs draw from websites, articles, forums, and public discussion, and the sources they rely on most often become the backbone of their answers. Building strong citation architecture means ensuring that accurate, credible, high authority sources are the ones most likely to shape the way AI tools summarize and recommend a brand.
What Is Generative Engine Optimization?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of improving the chances that AI systems use and cite your brand or content when generating answers. While traditional SEO is centered on ranking pages in search results, GEO focuses on how LLMs retrieve, interpret, and combine information when responding to a question. The objective is to strengthen the content and sources AI systems rely on, so your brand is treated as a trusted reference in AI responses.
What Is AI Share of Voice?
AI share of voice tracks how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers compared with competitors in the same category. It reflects visibility across AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Monitoring AI share of voice helps organizations see whether AI systems consistently include and recommend their brand for key queries or whether competitor brands are showing up more often.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT