How AI Search Is Recommending Tax Preparation Software: Monthly Trends

Executive Summary

TaxSlayer is the category's strongest upward mover in September 2026, rising 6.6 points from August to reach 63.1% valid recommendation coverage, a significant move that breaks the brand's prior stability. FreeTaxUSA remains the category leader at 82.9% coverage in September 2026, though its lead over the next brand has narrowed to 2.1 points over TurboTax at 80.8%. The top tier remains tightly clustered, with FreeTaxUSA, TurboTax, and H&R Block all within 2.6 points of each other.

The sharpest decline belongs to Jackson Hewitt, which has now fallen for two consecutive months and sits at 8.2% coverage in September 2026, down 10.3 points from its 18.5% baseline in July 2026. Drake Tax also shows a significant two-month decline to 2.5%, and TaxAct dropped 6.4 points in a single month from August to September, a significant move that erased its August gains. These declines stand against a category where three brands moved significantly against the July baseline this period: TaxSlayer as a riser, and Drake Tax and Jackson Hewitt as decliners.

Across the full July-to-September series, the category has moved from a stable July into two consecutive months of mixed movement. The qualified benchmark set grew from 670 observations in July 2026 to 691 in September 2026, and the benchmark recorded qualified observations across all six canonical AI surface families in both months.

Each monthly run begins with 800 prompt-surface observations (416 unique questions in July 2026; 440 in August 2026; 434 in September 2026) across the benchmark's defined AI/search surface universe. Of those, 800 mentioned a tracked brand or competitor in each month. 797 were relevant and 3 irrelevant in July 2026; 796 were relevant and 4 irrelevant in August 2026; 792 were relevant and 8 irrelevant in September 2026. The public metrics use the qualified observation counts that survive both qualification stages: 670 in July 2026, 678 in August 2026, and 691 in September 2026.

Key Findings

Benchmark Context

The report separates the raw collection universe from the qualified analysis set. Brand-level recommendation percentages are calculated within the qualified benchmark set.

These stage-level counts define the qualified denominator used throughout the brand-level tables below. August 2026 intermediate figures, including 678 qualified observations, appear in prose where they matter for interpretation.

Benchmark-Level Metrics

The recommendation-shaped answer share declined for a second consecutive month, from 53.6% in July 2026 to 45.9% in September 2026, the lowest level in the three-month series. August 2026 sat between these at 50.4%. The valid recommendation shortlist share also drifted down across the series, from 88.5% to 85.5%, indicating a sustained shift in the structure of answers within the qualified set rather than a single-month event.

AI Recommendation Trend

Leadership Cluster Holds, Three Brands Move Significantly

The top three brands remain stable and tightly clustered, while TaxSlayer's significant rise and the significant declines at Jackson Hewitt and Drake Tax define the month's movement. TaxAct's sharp single-month drop in September, though classified as stable against the July baseline, matters for the middle of the field.

The category-level change in September 2026 came from three significant movers, not from a single dominant shift. TaxSlayer's rise combined with continued declines at Jackson Hewitt and Drake Tax to reshape the mid-tier and lower field, while the leadership cluster of FreeTaxUSA, TurboTax, and H&R Block held steady within its existing range.

What Changed This Month

Jackson Hewitt

Jackson Hewitt's valid recommendation coverage fell from 18.5% in July 2026 to 8.2% in September 2026, a significant 10.3-point decline across the series. The brand has now declined for two consecutive months, with August 2026 at 10.9% and September 2026 at 8.2%. In absolute terms, valid recommendations fell from 124 in July 2026 to 57 in September 2026.

The raw mention presence rate also fell, from 23.9% in July 2026 to 13.5% in September 2026. The brand's top-3 rate held at 1.9% and the rank-one rate remained at 0.0%, meaning the decline is concentrated in whether the brand appears at all, not in how it ranks when surfaced.

With only 57 valid recommendations in September 2026, this is a small-count situation that warrants caution, though the two-month consistency of the decline strengthens the signal.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt clusters removed Jackson Hewitt from responses, and which competitors captured the recommendations the brand previously earned.

TaxSlayer

TaxSlayer rose from 57.2% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 63.1% in September 2026, a significant 5.9-point gain. The brand's single-month move from August to September was even sharper at 6.6 points, from 56.5% to 63.1%, also exceeding the normal variation threshold. Valid recommendation counts grew from 383 in July 2026 to 436 in September 2026.

The raw mention presence rate also rose, from 74.0% in July 2026 to 78.6% in September 2026, meaning the brand appears in more responses overall. Notably, this visibility gain did not translate into better ranking positions: the top-3 rate actually declined from 9.2% to 8.2%, and the rank-one rate held flat at 0.4%.

The distinction to notice is that TaxSlayer's growth is presence-driven rather than ranking-driven. The brand is being mentioned in more answers, but it is not moving up in the order of recommendation when it appears.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which surfaces or prompt types expanded TaxSlayer's presence, and what keeps its placements from converting into top-three recommendations.

Drake Tax

Drake Tax declined from 4.8% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 2.5% in September 2026, a significant 2.3-point drop on a small base. The brand's valid recommendation count fell from 32 in July 2026 to 17 in September 2026, continuing a two-month percentage decline (4.8%, 3.2%, 2.5%) across the series. The raw mention presence rate declined from 9.7% to 6.8%, though this movement stayed within normal variation.

With only 17 valid recommendations in September 2026, the percentage movement should be read with caution, but the direction has now been consistent for two months. Drake Tax operates at a fundamentally different visibility level than the leadership cluster, and the small counts amplify the proportional impact of losing a handful of recommendations.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which specific prompts still surface Drake Tax, and whether the decline concentrates in particular surfaces or question types.

TaxAct

TaxAct's September 2026 result deserves attention even though it is classified as stable against the July 2026 baseline. The brand fell from 55.2% in August 2026 to 48.8% in September 2026, a significant 6.4-point single-month drop that reversed its August gains. Against the July 2026 baseline of 52.8%, the September 2026 figure of 48.8% represents a 4.0-point decline that stayed within normal variation.

The raw mention presence rate also fell, from 74.2% in July 2026 to 65.8% in September 2026, an 8.4-point drop. Valid recommendation counts fell from 354 in July 2026 to 337 in September 2026. Despite the coverage loss, the brand's top-3 rate held nearly flat at 11.9% versus 12.1% in July, and the rank-one rate improved slightly to 0.4%.

The pattern for TaxAct resembles a presence problem rather than a ranking problem. The brand appears in fewer responses, but when it appears, its competitive position within the recommendation list has not eroded.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt clusters or surfaces drove the single-month presence loss, and whether the ranking stability holds across the surfaces where presence declined.

Category-Wide Stability

The remaining six brands stayed within normal variation in September 2026. The leadership trio of FreeTaxUSA (82.9%), TurboTax (80.8%), and H&R Block (80.3%) all declined modestly from their July 2026 baselines but remain tightly clustered. Cash App Taxes moved up 3.1 points from August 2026 to September 2026, recovering to 67.7% from its 64.6% August low, though still below its 71.3% July baseline. Liberty Tax and eFile.com remained stable at very low coverage levels.

The notable gap analysis shows the competitive repositioning clearly: Jackson Hewitt's gap to TaxSlayer widened from 38.7 points in July 2026 to 54.9 points in September 2026, widening every month as one brand rose while the other fell. Jackson Hewitt's lead over Liberty Tax compressed from 16.3 points to 6.0 points over the same period.

Buyer-Intent Interpretation

All 691 qualified observations in September 2026 fell into the brand recommendation cluster, consistent with July 2026's 670 and August 2026's 678 observations. The pricing and value and multi-brand comparison clusters recorded zero observations across all three months, meaning the public benchmark cannot yet answer questions about how price sensitivity or head-to-head comparison dynamics shape AI recommendations for tax preparation software. The comparison-analysis and pricing-analysis response types present in the data describe the format of answers, not buyer-intent segmentation. The commercial questions of pricing and direct comparison remain outside the current benchmark scope.

Brand Opportunity Summary

The benchmark identifies where attention is warranted; a company-level analysis is needed to explain why.

Evidence Behind the Benchmark

The aggregate metrics are built from prompt-level observations (query, surface, recommendation outcome, rank, sentiment, and citations where exposed). Company-level analysis can go deeper into prompt, competitor, surface, and evidence patterns. Source presence is not automatically treated as proof of causation.

About This Benchmark

This report is part of the LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery research program.

• AI Industry Market Discovery Methodology
• AI Industry Market Discovery Metrics
• AI Industry Market Discovery Standards

Report-Specific Interpretation Notes

• Movement between months identifies changes worth investigating; it does not by itself establish the cause of those changes.
• Small observation counts for brands like eFile.com (3 valid recommendations), Drake Tax (17), and Liberty Tax (15) mean their percentage movements should be read with caution regardless of whether the change was classified as significant or stable.
• The qualified denominator (691 observations in September 2026) differs from the raw collection universe (800 prompts); brand-level percentages are calculated within the qualified set only.
• Directional analysis: a significant movement indicates the change exceeds the benchmark's normal month-to-month variation, not that a specific cause has been identified.

Next Step

The Public Benchmark Shows Where a Brand Is Winning or Losing. A Company-Level Audit Shows Why.

Beneath the aggregate percentages sit questions the public benchmark cannot answer: which high-intent prompts are won, which competitor takes the recommendation when a brand loses, what attributes AI systems associate with each option, and which external sources shape those answers. For a brand like Jackson Hewitt losing 67 valid recommendations since July 2026, or TaxSlayer gaining 53 while its top-three rank declined, the next question is not whether but why, and that answer lives at the prompt level.

A company-specific AI visibility audit maps those prompt, surface, competitor, ranking, sentiment, and evidence-source patterns into a prioritized visibility strategy. It turns the benchmark's directional signals into actionable intelligence for the brands that need it most.

Request an AI visibility audit