Semperis AI Visibility Market Strategy Report - Identity and Access Management
This report supports CiteWorks Studio's examination of how AI search is recommending Identity and Access Management. For more detail, you can also read Identity and Access Management: AI Visibility Discovery Index.
On this report
Browse sections
- Answer Capsule
- Who This Report Is For
- Report Card
- Executive Summary
- What Semperis Is Winning
- Where Semperis Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps
- Biggest Opportunity
- Competitive Landscape
- Prompt Evidence
- What CiteWorks Studio Would Do Next
- Why This Matters
- Core Metrics
- Sentiment Score
- Sentiment by Platform
- Methodology
- See How AI Is Recommending Your Brand
- Next Step
- Learn More
Key Takeaways
- Semperis had zero mentions, zero valid recommendations, and no presence on any of the six tracked platforms in October 2026.
- Okta and SailPoint captured most recommendation activity in the category, with BeyondTrust a distant third and the rest of the field at zero.
- The main gap for Semperis is non-appearance at the recommendation stage, not a weak ranking position.
- The clearest path forward is to build retrievable, citable content and third-party evidence that can surface in high-intent IAM prompts.
Answer Capsule
Semperis recorded zero valid recommendations across all 219 qualified observations in the October 2026 Identity and Access Management benchmark, leaving it absent from every AI-generated buyer shortlist in the category. The company held no measurable presence on any tracked platform, including ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Its strongest prior signal was a 1.6% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026, which has since fallen to zero. The clearest opportunity is to establish any recommendation-stage presence at all in a category where Okta and SailPoint together absorb the majority of AI recommendation activity.
Who This Report Is For
This report is written for Semperis marketing, product marketing, and executive leadership teams evaluating where the brand stands in AI-led discovery for Identity and Access Management, and for category buyers and analysts tracking recommendation-stage visibility across the IAM vendor landscape.
Report Card
Field | Value |
|---|---|
Report type | AI Visibility Company Market Strategy Report |
Target company | Semperis |
Category / market studied | Identity and Access Management |
Reporting month | October 2026 |
AI platforms tracked | 6 (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode) |
Public high-intent clusters | 1 active (Best Identity Management Solutions & Platforms); 2 additional clusters defined but with no qualified data |
AI observations analyzed | 219 qualified observations from 800 prompt-surface runs |
Competitors tracked | 9 |
Executive Summary
Semperis holds no recommendation-stage presence in the October 2026 Identity and Access Management benchmark. Across 219 qualified observations, the brand recorded zero mentions, zero valid recommendations, zero top-three placements, and zero rank-one placements. Its raw mention presence rate was 0.0%, meaning AI systems did not surface the brand by name in any qualified response during the reporting month.
This is a decline from the July 2026 baseline, when Semperis recorded a 1.6% valid recommendation coverage rate on three valid recommendations. The brand moved to 0.0% in August 2026, recovered marginally to 0.4% in September 2026, and returned to 0.0% in October 2026. The pattern across the four-month series is one of near-total absence with brief, low-count flickers rather than a sustained recommendation footprint.
The benchmark's only active cluster, Best Identity Management Solutions and Platforms, captured all 219 qualified observations. Semperis recorded no presence in this cluster. The two additional clusters defined in the benchmark structure, Identity Management Platform Comparisons and Identity Management Pricing and Cost Evaluation, produced no qualified observations in October 2026, so no recommendation signal exists for Semperis in those buyer-intent contexts either.
No platform-level signal exists for Semperis. The brand recorded zero mentions across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. There is no strongest platform, no strongest cluster, and no positive or negative framing to report because the brand was not surfaced at all.
The category itself is highly concentrated. Okta led with 51.6% valid recommendation coverage and SailPoint followed at 48.9%, a gap of 2.7 percentage points. BeyondTrust held a distant third at 19.6%. The remaining seven tracked brands, including Semperis, received no valid recommendations in October 2026. This concentration means AI systems are consistently routing IAM buyer questions to a small set of brands, and Semperis is not among them.
The clearest gap is the complete absence of recommendation-stage visibility. Semperis is not visible but under-recommended; it is not visible at all. The brand does not appear in AI-generated answers to IAM buyer questions, which means it does not enter the buyer shortlist at the point where AI systems form recommendations.
What Semperis Is Winning
There are no evidence-backed wins for Semperis in the October 2026 benchmark. The brand recorded zero mentions, zero valid recommendations, zero top-three placements, and zero rank-one placements across all 219 qualified observations and all six tracked platforms.
The only positive signal in the four-month series is the July 2026 baseline, when Semperis recorded three valid recommendations and a 1.6% coverage rate. That signal did not persist. By August 2026, coverage had fallen to 0.0%, and the brand has not recovered a sustained recommendation presence since.
This report states plainly that Semperis has no measurable recommendation-stage wins in the current benchmark. The absence is the finding.
Where Semperis Has the Clearest AI Visibility Gaps
Questions This Section Answers
- How does Semperis's presence compare with Okta, SailPoint, and BeyondTrust in AI-generated IAM answers?
- Why is Semperis's absence a non-appearance gap rather than a ranking gap?
- Does Semperis's domain appear among the sources AI platforms cite for IAM questions?
Semperis is absent from the AI recommendation layer in Identity and Access Management. The benchmark's qualified observation set of 219 responses produced zero mentions of the brand. This means AI systems answering IAM buyer questions did not name Semperis in any qualified response during October 2026.
The gap is not one of weak placement or low rank. It is a gap of non-appearance. Okta appeared in 95.0% of qualified observations and SailPoint in 78.5%. BeyondTrust, the third-place brand, appeared in 28.8%. Semperis appeared in 0.0%. The distance between Semperis and even the lowest-ranked visible brand is the full width of the presence scale.
The category structure compounds this gap. Okta and SailPoint together hold the leadership tier, with a combined valid recommendation coverage that leaves little room for challengers. BeyondTrust holds a distant third. The remaining seven brands, including Semperis, Keyfactor, Axiad, RSA Security, CLEAR, Cross Match Technologies, and Telos Corporation, received no valid recommendations. AI systems are not distributing recommendation credit across the full tracked universe; they are concentrating it at the top.
For Semperis, the competitive displacement question is not which competitor took its spot. The brand did not hold a spot to lose in October 2026. The question is whether any category prompts genuinely warrant Semperis inclusion, and if so, which prompts surface the brand at all. The benchmark data does not answer that question because the brand did not appear in the qualified set.
The source layer offers one contextual signal. The top cited domains across all AI platform responses in October 2026 included general social and video platforms (youtube.com, reddit.com, facebook.com), analyst and news sources (gartner.com, linkedin.com, finance.yahoo.com), and two tracked brands' own domains (sailpoint.com at rank 6, okta.com at rank 9). Semperis's domain did not appear in the top 10 cited domains. This does not prove causation, but it indicates that the public evidence layer AI systems are drawing from does not prominently feature Semperis-owned or Semperis-associated sources in this category.
Biggest Opportunity
Questions This Section Answers
- Which buyer-intent cluster offers Semperis the clearest path into the AI recommendation layer?
- What would it take for Semperis to reach the level of recommendation presence BeyondTrust holds?
- Why does entering the consideration set matter more than displacing Okta or SailPoint?
The single biggest opportunity for Semperis is to establish any recommendation-stage presence in the Best Identity Management Solutions and Platforms cluster, the only cluster with qualified data in October 2026. This cluster captures queries asking which IAM provider to choose or what the best option is. It is the cluster where AI systems form the buyer shortlist.
Semperis does not need to displace Okta or SailPoint to create value. It needs to enter the consideration set. The benchmark shows that BeyondTrust, with a 19.6% valid recommendation coverage rate and a 28.8% presence rate, holds a distant but real third-place position. That position is achievable. Semperis currently holds 0.0% on both measures.
The path from zero to any recommendation presence requires the brand to become retrievable and citable in the public evidence layer that AI systems draw from when answering IAM buyer questions. The benchmark's citation data shows that AI systems are pulling from analyst sources, social platforms, and brand-owned domains. Semperis does not appear in the top cited domains. Building a source footprint that AI systems can retrieve is the prerequisite for entering the recommendation layer.
Competitive Landscape
Questions This Section Answers
- How large is the recommendation gap between the IAM leaders and the rest of the tracked brands?
- Which brands join Semperis at zero top-three and rank-one placements in this benchmark?
Okta and SailPoint hold recommendation-stage strength in the Identity and Access Management category, with BeyondTrust as a distant third. Semperis and six other tracked brands recorded no valid recommendations in October 2026.
Brand | Top-3 rate | Rank-1 rate | Avg recommended rank | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Okta | 44.75% | 24.66% | 1.73 | 0.6058 |
SailPoint | 28.31% | 5.94% | 2.99 | 0.6860 |
BeyondTrust | 5.94% | 0.46% | 4.22 | 0.6984 |
Keyfactor | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
Axiad | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
Semperis | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
RSA Security | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
Telos Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
CLEAR (by Alclear, LLC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
Cross Match Technologies | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A | 0.0000 |
Average recommended rank covers rank-eligible recommendations only.
Semperis sits at the bottom of the table with zero top-three rate, zero rank-one rate, and no rank-eligible recommendations. The brand is tied with five other tracked companies at 0.00% across all placement measures. The table shows that recommendation credit in this category is concentrated at the top, with Okta and SailPoint absorbing the majority of top-three and rank-one placements.
Prompt Evidence
ChatGPT / Best Identity Management Solutions & Platforms Prompt: "What's the best Identity Governance software?" Result: Semperis was not mentioned in the response. The benchmark recorded no presence for the brand on ChatGPT in October 2026.
Google AI Overviews / Best Identity Management Solutions & Platforms Prompt: "identity governance and administration" Result: Semperis did not appear. Google AI Overviews produced 64 qualified observations in October 2026, and Semperis recorded zero mentions across all of them.
Perplexity / Best Identity Management Solutions & Platforms Prompt: "pam tools" Result: Semperis was absent from the response. Perplexity produced 12 qualified observations, and the brand recorded no presence.
Copilot / Best Identity Management Solutions & Platforms Prompt: "identity and access management solutions" Result: Semperis was not surfaced. Copilot produced 34 qualified observations in October 2026, and the brand recorded zero mentions.
What CiteWorks Studio Would Do Next
Phase 1: AI Visibility Market Discovery Audit Map every IAM prompt where Semperis should appear, identify which competitors are being recommended instead, and establish a baseline for recommendation-stage visibility across all six tracked platforms.
Phase 2: Recommendation Readiness Plan Define the specific prompt clusters and buyer-intent questions where Semperis has a credible right to be recommended, and prioritize the gaps between current absence and achievable presence.
Phase 3: Owned Answer Layer Buildout Develop Semperis-owned content structured to answer the high-intent IAM questions AI systems are fielding, with clear, extractable positioning that AI systems can retrieve and cite.
Phase 4: Citation and Authority Layer Development Build the public evidence layer Semperis needs to become retrievable, including analyst mentions, third-party validation, and source pages that AI systems can synthesize when forming IAM recommendations.
Phase 5: Monthly AI Visibility and Recommendation Tracking Track Semperis's movement from zero presence toward recommendation-stage visibility, measuring coverage, top-three rate, rank-one rate, and sentiment across all tracked platforms month over month.
Why This Matters
Questions This Section Answers
- What happens to Semperis in the IAM buying process when AI systems generate the shortlist?
- Why is absence from AI-generated recommendations disqualifying for buyers evaluating IAM providers?
AI systems are forming the IAM buyer shortlist before a buyer ever visits a vendor website. In October 2026, the benchmark shows that AI-generated recommendations in Identity and Access Management are concentrated among three brands: Okta, SailPoint, and BeyondTrust. Seven tracked brands, including Semperis, received no valid recommendations. This means buyers asking AI systems which IAM provider to choose are not hearing about Semperis at all.
Presence alone is not enough, but absence is disqualifying. A brand that does not appear in AI-generated answers cannot be shortlisted, compared, or selected at the recommendation stage. For Semperis, the next move is targeted correction of the prompt, page, and citation layers that determine whether AI systems surface the brand when buyers ask which IAM provider to choose.
Core Metrics
Metric | Value |
|---|---|
Mentions | 0 |
Valid recommendations | 0 |
Top 3 recommendation count | 0 |
Rank #1 recommendation count | 0 |
Average recommended rank | N/A |
Positive mentions | 0 |
Neutral mentions | 0 |
Negative mentions | 0 |
Raw mention presence rate | 0.00% |
Valid recommendation coverage | 0.00% |
Top 3 recommendation rate | 0.00% |
Rank #1 recommendation rate | 0.00% |
Net sentiment score | 0.0000 |
Strongest cluster by recommendation behavior | None (no presence in any cluster) |
Strongest platform by recommendation behavior | None (no presence on any platform) |
Sentiment Score
Sentiment Score = (positive mentions x 1 + neutral mentions x 0 + negative mentions x -1) / total mentions
Semperis recorded zero mentions in October 2026, so the sentiment score is 0.0000 with no classified mentions to evaluate. This is not a neutral signal in the conventional sense. A score of zero from zero mentions means the brand was not present in the data at all, not that it was mentioned neutrally.
This distinction matters because unclassified mention counts can be misleading. A brand with ten neutral mentions and a brand with zero mentions both produce a sentiment score of zero, but they are in fundamentally different positions. The first brand is visible but not recommendation-led. The second brand is absent. Semperis is in the second position.
Share of voice is a diagnostic metric, not a business KPI. A positive recommendation, a neutral reference, a cautionary mention, and a competitor-displaced mention are not equal. Counting all mentions as wins is bad measurement. Classified sentiment is required before interpreting AI visibility, and for Semperis, there are no classified mentions to interpret.
Sentiment by Platform
Platform | Mentions | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Sentiment Score | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChatGPT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | No public presence in this packet |
Copilot | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | No public presence in this packet |
Gemini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | No public presence in this packet |
Perplexity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | No public presence in this packet |
Google AI Overviews | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | No public presence in this packet |
Google AI Mode | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | No public presence in this packet |
Methodology
- This report is a benchmark-based analysis of Semperis's AI visibility and recommendation-stage presence in the Identity and Access Management category for October 2026. It is not a client implementation case study and does not imply that any remediation has occurred.
- The reporting window is October 2026, with trend comparisons to the July 2026 baseline and monthly data from August 2026 and September 2026 where available.
- Six AI and search platforms were tracked: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. All six produced at least one qualified observation in October 2026.
- The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in October 2026. After deduplication, 653 unique questions were identified. After relevance and eligibility filtering, 219 qualified observations formed the public denominator for brand-level metrics.
- The competitor universe consists of ten tracked brands: Okta, SailPoint, BeyondTrust, Keyfactor, Axiad, Semperis, RSA Security, Telos Corporation, CLEAR (by Alclear, LLC), and Cross Match Technologies.
- One public high-intent cluster produced qualified data in October 2026: Best Identity Management Solutions and Platforms (consideration stage). Two additional clusters, Identity Management Platform Comparisons and Identity Management Pricing and Cost Evaluation, were defined but produced no qualified observations.
- Stage 0 extraction retained the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources at the prompt level.
- A mention is defined as any appearance of the brand name in an AI-generated response within a qualified observation, regardless of recommendation status or sentiment.
- A valid recommendation is defined as a positive recommendation with a rank position of 1 through 10. Neutral mentions, negative mentions, cautionary references, and listed-only appearances are not counted as valid recommendations.
- Brand-level percentages are calculated against the qualified observation set of 219, not the raw collection of 800 prompt-surface observations.
- The benchmark measures how tracked brands appear and are recommended across qualified AI/search surface responses. It does not measure market share, attributable sales, organic-search ranking, or causality from metric movement alone.
- Small-count movement: Semperis moved on a base of fewer than five observations across the series. The July 2026 baseline of 1.6% coverage represented three valid recommendations. These changes are worth watching but should not be over-read.
See How AI Is Recommending Your Brand
The public benchmark shows where Semperis stands in AI-generated recommendations for Identity and Access Management. A company-level AI visibility audit maps the specific prompts, competitors, platforms, and source patterns that determine whether Semperis enters the buyer shortlist when AI systems answer IAM questions.
/ Take the next step
Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?
We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.
Measurable, Repeatable Programme
Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge
Citation Architecture Review
Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.
AI Visibility Audit
Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.
/ Learn More
Understanding AI search visibility.
AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.


