CiteWorks Studio

How AI Search Is Recommending Fresh Dog Food and Pet Meal Delivery: Monthly Trends

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
9 minutes read

Key Takeaways

  • The Farmer's Dog stayed in first at 68.7% coverage, but its lead over JustFoodForDogs narrowed to 0.6 points from 5.2 points in July.
  • JustFoodForDogs held near prior coverage at 68.1% while improving top-three and rank-one placement, making the top tier more competitive.
  • Nom Nom had the largest drop in the category, falling 15.3 points to 27.7%, while Freshpet stayed stable and moved ahead of it.
  • Across the benchmark, valid recommendation shortlist share fell from 79.1% to 71.1%, and no brand posted a significant coverage increase in August.

Executive Summary

The Farmer's Dog remains the category leader in August 2026, though its lead over second-place JustFoodForDogs narrowed sharply. Valid recommendation coverage for The Farmer's Dog fell from 76.7% in July 2026 to 68.7% in August 2026, a decline of 8.0 points that this benchmark classifies as a significant decline. JustFoodForDogs held close to its prior level at 68.1% coverage, down 3.4 points from 71.5%, a change that falls within normal month-to-month variation. The gap between the top two brands narrowed from 5.2 points in July 2026 to 0.6 points in August 2026 — the tightest spread between the top two brands recorded in this two-month series.

Nom Nom recorded the largest decline in the category, falling 15.3 points from 43.0% coverage in July 2026 to 27.7% in August 2026, also a significant decline. Freshpet held stable at 40.2% coverage (down 0.6 points from 40.8%, within normal variation), and as a result moved from trailing Nom Nom by 2.2 points in July 2026 to leading it by 12.5 points in August 2026 — a swing of 14.7 points across the two-month series.

Four brands recorded significant declines this period — The Farmer's Dog, Nom Nom, PetPlate, and Maev — while four brands remained stable within normal variation: Freshpet, JustFoodForDogs, A Pup Above, and Sundays for Dogs. No brand recorded a significant rise on the primary coverage metric. The result is a more compressed top tier and a reordered middle tier compared with July 2026.

This report draws from 800 prompt-surface observations collected in August 2026 across six AI/search surface families, yielding 525 unique questions. Of these, 800 prompts referenced a tracked brand or competitor, 777 were relevant to the Fresh Dog Food and Pet Meal Delivery category, and 23 were irrelevant. The qualified benchmark set used for all brand-level percentages in this report totals 505 observations.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • The Farmer’s Dog-8.0% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202676.7%
    Aug 202668.7%
  • JustFoodForDogs-3.4%
    Jul 202671.5%
    Aug 202668.1%
  • Freshpet-0.6%
    Jul 202640.8%
    Aug 202640.2%
  • Nom Nom-15.3% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202643.0%
    Aug 202627.7%
  • PetPlate-7.1% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202626.3%
    Aug 202619.2%
  • A Pup Above-0.4%
    Jul 20265.4%
    Aug 20265.0%
  • Sundays for Dogs-1.8%
    Jul 20264.6%
    Aug 20262.8%
  • Maev-2.8% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20264.6%
    Aug 20261.8%

Key Findings

Signal

Aug 2026 finding

Category leader

The Farmer's Dog at 68.7% coverage, down 8.0 points from 76.7% in Jul 2026

Leader gap

The Farmer's Dog leads JustFoodForDogs by 0.6 points, down from a 5.2-point gap in Jul 2026

Largest riser

No brand recorded a significant rise on the primary coverage metric; Freshpet's 2.4-point rank-one rate gain was the largest positive movement among secondary placement metrics

Largest decliner

Nom Nom down 15.3 points from 43.0% to 27.7% coverage

Significant decliners

Four brands: The Farmer's Dog, Nom Nom, PetPlate, Maev

Stable brands

Four brands: Freshpet, JustFoodForDogs, A Pup Above, Sundays for Dogs

Benchmark Context

The report separates the raw collection universe from the qualified analysis set used for all brand-level percentages. The table below traces that qualification path for both months in this series.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations collected

800

800

Prompt-surface pairs run across the defined AI/search surface universe

Unique questions

502

525

Distinct questions after removing duplicates

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a tracked brand or competitor

Relevant prompts

785

777

Prompts relevant to the Fresh Dog Food and Pet Meal Delivery category

Irrelevant prompts

15

23

Prompts outside the category scope

Qualified benchmark observations

502

505

Public denominator: observations surviving both qualification stages

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation

These research-stage counts show how the public qualified denominator is derived from the raw collection universe before any brand percentage is calculated.

Benchmark-Level Metrics

Metric

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Change

Qualified observations

502

505

+3

Companies tracked

8

8

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

43.4%

45.3%

Up 1.9 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

79.1%

71.1%

Down 8.0 points

Category leader by coverage

The Farmer's Dog

The Farmer's Dog

No change

The intermediate month of July 2026 established the baseline for this two-month series. August 2026 saw the recommendation-shaped answer share rise slightly to 45.3% from 43.4%, while the valid recommendation shortlist share fell 8.0 points from 79.1% to 71.1% — a pattern that shows a broader set of answers with fewer clean recommendation shortlists among them.

AI Recommendation Trend

A Tightened Two-Brand Leadership Race Reshapes the Category

The category moved from a clear hierarchy toward a compressed top tier. The Farmer's Dog's coverage fell from 76.7% in July 2026 to 68.7% in August 2026, a significant decline, while JustFoodForDogs moved from 71.5% to 68.1%, a change within normal month-to-month variation. The result is a 0.6-point gap between the top two brands, the tightest spread recorded in this two-month series.

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Aug 2026 rank

The Farmer's Dog

76.7%

68.7%

Down 8.0 points

1st

JustFoodForDogs

71.5%

68.1%

Down 3.4 points

2nd

Freshpet

40.8%

40.2%

Down 0.6 points

3rd

Nom Nom

43.0%

27.7%

Down 15.3 points

4th

PetPlate

26.3%

19.2%

Down 7.1 points

5th

A Pup Above

5.4%

5.0%

Down 0.4 points

6th

Maev

4.6%

1.8%

Down 2.8 points

7th

Sundays for Dogs

4.6%

2.8%

Down 1.8 points

8th

The category-level shift came from a combination of several significant declines rather than a single dominant move. Four brands — The Farmer's Dog, Nom Nom, PetPlate, and Maev — moved beyond normal month-to-month variation, compressing the top of the distribution and reordering positions between second and fifth place.

What Changed This Month

The Farmer's Dog

The Farmer's Dog remained the category leader but saw its coverage drop significantly from 76.7% in July 2026 to 68.7% in August 2026, a decline of 8.0 points. Its top-three rate fell from 65.3% to 54.9%, a drop of 10.4 points, and its rank-one rate dropped from 48.6% to 35.0%, a decline of 13.6 points.

The brand's raw presence remained high at 88.9% in August 2026, essentially flat from 92.0% in July 2026. This distinction matters: The Farmer's Dog is still mentioned in nearly 9 of 10 qualified observations, but it is being recommended as the top choice far less often.

The decline in rank-one recommendations while presence held steady suggests the brand is appearing in answers but losing the decisive first-position recommendation. Its valid recommendation count fell from 385 in July 2026 to 347 in August 2026.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt patterns are associated with The Farmer's Dog losing the top recommendation slot, and which competitor is capturing those rank-one positions?

Nom Nom

Nom Nom posted the largest decline in the category, falling 15.3 points from 43.0% coverage in July 2026 to 27.7% in August 2026. Its raw mention presence also fell, down 16.8 points from 54.6% to 37.8%.

The brand's top-three rate fell from 18.3% to 10.7%, a drop of 7.6 points, while its rank-one rate declined from 1.2% to 0.6%, a drop of 0.6 points. Its valid recommendation count dropped from 216 to 140, and its presence count fell from 274 to 191.

Nom Nom's decline is visible at both the presence and recommendation levels, indicating the brand is appearing in fewer answers and being recommended less often when it does appear. This is the largest presence decline recorded for any brand in this series; the benchmark cannot establish whether this reflects a platform-specific effect, a prompt-set effect, or another cause.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which surfaces or prompt types drove the 16.8-point presence decline this month?

PetPlate

PetPlate declined, falling from 26.3% coverage in July 2026 to 19.2% in August 2026, a drop of 7.1 points. Its raw mention presence also fell, down 6.5 points from 29.1% to 22.6%.

The brand's top-three rate declined from 6.8% to 5.5%, a drop of 1.3 points, while its rank-one rate was essentially flat. Its valid recommendation count fell from 132 to 97, and its presence count dropped from 146 to 114.

PetPlate's decline was concentrated in presence and overall coverage rather than in top-tier placement. The brand remains competitive for mid-list recommendations but is being included in fewer answers overall.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt categories reduced PetPlate's inclusion rate, and is the decline driven by specific surfaces or by a broader shift in how the brand is evaluated?

Maev

Maev declined from 4.6% coverage in July 2026 to 1.8% in August 2026, a drop of 2.8 points. The brand's valid recommendation count fell from 23 to 9, and its presence count dropped from 28 to 17.

Despite the small absolute numbers, Maev's top-three rate held close to its prior level (1.0% versus 0.8%), and its rank-one rate improved slightly from 0.0% to 0.2%. The brand's net sentiment score remained around 0.9.

The decline is concentrated in reduced presence and overall coverage rather than in placement quality. When Maev is recommended, it maintains comparable positioning, but it is being included in fewer answers.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt types drove the reduction in Maev's presence from 28 to 17 mentions?

Comparative Repositioning: Freshpet and JustFoodForDogs

Freshpet and JustFoodForDogs both held stable coverage this month, but both improved on placement metrics. Freshpet's rank-one rate rose from 1.4% in July 2026 to 3.8% in August 2026, a gain of 2.4 points. Its top-three rate also moved from 15.7% to 18.2%.

JustFoodForDogs' top-three rate rose from 45.6% to 48.7%, and its rank-one rate rose from 18.1% to 22.4%. Its average recommended rank improved from 2.37 to 2.01, while its overall coverage remained within normal month-to-month variation at 68.1%.

The gap between Freshpet and Nom Nom flipped direction. Freshpet trailed Nom Nom by 2.2 points in July 2026 and now leads by 12.5 points in August 2026, a swing of 14.7 points.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Whether Freshpet's rank-one rate gain reflects a durable pattern rather than month-to-month noise, and which evidence sources may be associated with its improved placement.

Buyer-Intent Interpretation

Buyer-intent cluster

What it captures

Strategic question

Brand Recommendation

Which brand is recommended for a given need

Who wins the recommendation when a specific need is expressed

Pricing & Value

How brands are positioned on price and value

Which brand is associated with favorable pricing signals

Multi-Brand Comparison

How brands are compared head-to-head

Which brand wins direct comparison prompts

In August 2026, all 505 qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation cluster. The buyer-stage summaries for the comparison and pricing-and-value clusters were empty, meaning the public benchmark did not capture qualified observations that asked AI systems to compare brands directly or evaluate them on price and value.

This means the current benchmark can describe which brand AI systems recommend for a given need, but it cannot yet answer commercial questions about head-to-head comparison outcomes or pricing and value positioning. Those questions require a dedicated company-level analysis that drills into the specific prompt patterns where comparison and pricing dynamics would surface.

Brand Opportunity Summary

Brand

Aug 2026 coverage

Current signal

Highest-priority diagnostic

The Farmer's Dog

68.7%

Category leader; coverage declined significantly and rank-one recommendations fell sharply

Which prompts are shifting rank-one recommendations away

JustFoodForDogs

68.1%

Near-tied with the leader; top-three and rank-one rates rose

Whether the top-three and rank-one gains are sustainable

Freshpet

40.2%

Stable coverage with a rank-one rate gain

What evidence sources are associated with the improved top placement

Nom Nom

27.7%

Largest decline this period, across presence and coverage

Which surfaces or prompts drove the presence decline

PetPlate

19.2%

Declined, driven mainly by reduced presence

Which prompt categories reduced inclusion rate

A Pup Above

5.0%

Stable at low coverage, modest presence decline

Whether low counts reflect category scope or visibility limits

Maev

1.8%

Coverage declined significantly on small absolute counts

Which prompt types reduced presence from 28 to 17 mentions

Sundays for Dogs

2.8%

Stable at low coverage on small absolute counts

Whether the presence decline signals visibility loss or category-fit limits

The aggregate metrics in this report are built from prompt-level observations capturing the query, the AI surface used, the recommendation outcome, the rank of each brand mentioned, sentiment, and citations where exposed. A company-level analysis can go deeper into prompt, competitor, surface, and evidence patterns to explain the movements observed in this month's benchmark. Presence in an AI answer is not by itself evidence of causation.

Small absolute counts affect several of these brands: Maev, A Pup Above, and Sundays for Dogs each operate on a base of fewer than 30 valid recommendations, so a change of a few observations can move the percentage by several points. All percentages in this report are calculated against the qualified benchmark set of 505 observations in August 2026, not the 800 raw prompt-surface starts; the two denominators should not be interchanged. Additional methodology detail is available at AI Industry Market Discovery Methodology, AI Industry Market Discovery Metrics, and AI Industry Market Discovery Standards.

Next Step

The Public Benchmark Shows Where a Brand Is Winning or Losing. A Company-Level Audit Shows Why.

The aggregate percentages in this report raise questions that the benchmark alone cannot answer. When The Farmer's Dog loses a rank-one recommendation, which competitor picks it up, and in response to which prompt? When Nom Nom's presence drops by 16.8 points, which surfaces stopped surfacing the brand? What attributes might AI systems associate with Freshpet's improved rank-one rate, and which external sources could be shaping those associations?

A company-specific AI visibility audit maps those prompt, surface, competitor, ranking, sentiment, and evidence-source patterns into a prioritized visibility strategy. It answers the "why" behind the movement and identifies where a brand can act.

Request an AI visibility audit

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

What Is AI Citation Intelligence?
AI citation intelligence is the process of measuring where AI platforms source their information and how frequently a brand is mentioned or referenced in AI-generated responses. Because LLMs synthesize across multiple sources, the sites and brands that appear repeatedly tend to influence how a topic or company is framed. This practice focuses on identifying which sources shape AI outputs and tracking brand visibility across different AI systems.
What Is Citation Architecture?
Citation architecture describes the set of sources that consistently inform how AI systems talk about a brand, product, or topic. LLMs draw from websites, articles, forums, and public discussion, and the sources they rely on most often become the backbone of their answers. Building strong citation architecture means ensuring that accurate, credible, high authority sources are the ones most likely to shape the way AI tools summarize and recommend a brand.
What Is Generative Engine Optimization?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of improving the chances that AI systems use and cite your brand or content when generating answers. While traditional SEO is centered on ranking pages in search results, GEO focuses on how LLMs retrieve, interpret, and combine information when responding to a question. The objective is to strengthen the content and sources AI systems rely on, so your brand is treated as a trusted reference in AI responses.
What Is AI Share of Voice?
AI share of voice tracks how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers compared with competitors in the same category. It reflects visibility across AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Monitoring AI share of voice helps organizations see whether AI systems consistently include and recommend their brand for key queries or whether competitor brands are showing up more often.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT