CiteWorks Studio

How AI Search Is Recommending Registered Agent Services: Monthly Trends

Mark HuntleyBy Mark HuntleyFounder and CEO
12 minutes read

Key Takeaways

  • Northwest Registered Agent remained the coverage leader in September 2026 at 59.9%, holding a 9.1-point lead over ZenBusiness despite a modest decline from July.
  • The biggest category shift happened across the July-to-September window, with seven of ten tracked brands posting significant declines and no significant risers.
  • September itself was relatively stable, with no brand moving beyond normal month-to-month variation after sharper contractions in August.
  • Several brands, especially LegalZoom and Harbor Compliance, stayed visible in answers but converted that presence into recommendations less often over the summer.

Executive Summary

Northwest Registered Agent remains the category's coverage leader in September 2026, holding valid recommendation coverage of 59.9% and a 9.1-point gap over ZenBusiness at 50.8%. This is a slightly narrower lead than in August 2026, when Northwest Registered Agent's 61.4% coverage put it 9.1 points ahead of ZenBusiness at 52.3%. The benchmark shows Northwest Registered Agent's position as stable despite a second straight month of modest decline, keeping it clearly ahead of the field.

The category's most consequential movement is visible across the baseline-to-current series. Since July 2026, seven of the ten tracked brands registered significant declines: LegalZoom is down 14.7 points from 57.0% to 42.3%, InCorp is down 9.5 points from 16.1% to 6.6%, Harbor Compliance is down 8.5 points from 22.2% to 13.7%, Rocket Lawyer is down 7.8 points from 16.1% to 8.3%, Bizee (Incfile) is down 7.4 points from 49.3% to 41.9%, ZenBusiness is down 6.4 points from 57.2% to 50.8%, and Registered Agents Inc is down 1.9 points from 2.3% to 0.4%. No significant risers emerged over the same window.

This month itself was comparatively quiet. No brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation between August and September 2026, making September a consolidation month after the sharper contractions concentrated in August. The absence of significant single-month movement means the category's current shape is the product of accumulated declines across the summer rather than a fresh shock in September.

Each monthly run begins with 800 prompt-surface observations (456 unique questions in July 2026, 519 in August 2026, and 519 in September 2026) across the benchmark's defined AI/search surface universe. Of those, 800 mentioned a tracked brand or competitor in all three months; 757 were relevant and 43 were irrelevant in July 2026, 764 were relevant and 36 were irrelevant in August 2026, and 767 were relevant and 33 were irrelevant in September 2026. The public metrics use the 442 qualified observations in July 2026, 474 in August 2026, and 504 in September 2026 that survive both qualification stages.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
  • Northwest Registered Agent59.9%
  • ZenBusiness50.8%
  • LegalZoom42.3%
  • Bizee (Incfile)41.9%
  • Harbor Compliance13.7%
  • Rocket Lawyer8.3%
  • InCorp6.6%
  • CSC (Corporation Service Company)0.4%
  • CT Corporation0.4%
  • Registered Agents Inc0.4%

Key Findings

Signal

September 2026 finding

Coverage leader

Northwest Registered Agent at 59.9% valid recommendation coverage

Largest riser

None; no brand registered a significant gain this month

Largest decliner (month)

Bizee (Incfile), down 4.7 points from August 2026 to 41.9%

Significant decliners (vs baseline)

Seven brands since July 2026; none significant month-over-month

Category movement

Broad contraction across middle and lower tiers; leader stable

Surface breadth

All six AI surface families captured qualified observations

Benchmark Context

The report separates the raw collection universe from the qualified analysis set. Brand-level recommendation percentages are calculated within the qualified benchmark set.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations collected

800

800

Raw prompt-surface pairs collected across the AI/search surface universe

Unique questions

456

519

Distinct questions after de-duplication

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a tracked brand or competitor

Relevant prompts

757

767

Prompts relevant to the category after filtering

Irrelevant prompts

43

33

Prompts filtered out as not category-relevant

Qualified benchmark observations

442

504

Public denominator: observations surviving both qualification stages

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

AI surface families with at least one qualified observation

The qualified set grew steadily across the series, from 442 observations in July 2026 to 474 in August 2026 and 504 in September 2026. That expansion matters for interpreting the declines below: most brands lost coverage share even as the qualified denominator grew.

Benchmark-Level Metrics

Metric

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Change

Qualified observations

442

504

Up 62 observations

Companies tracked

10

10

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

38.0%

29.4%

Down 8.6 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

67.4%

60.3%

Down 7.1 points

Category leader by coverage

Northwest Registered Agent (64.5%)

Northwest Registered Agent (59.9%)

Leader stable

The composition shift visible in August continued into September. Recommendation-shaped answer share fell to 29.4% in September 2026 from 38.0% in July 2026, and the valid recommendation shortlist share dropped to 60.3% from 67.4%. More qualified observations are yielding proportionally fewer recommendation-shaped answers, a compositional shift that coincides with the broad coverage declines documented across the category below.

AI Recommendation Trend

The category leader held position while the middle tier compressed through accumulated decline

Northwest Registered Agent retained the top position in September 2026 with 59.9% valid recommendation coverage, down 4.6 points from 64.5% in July 2026, a shift within its stable range. The competitive story is the compression behind it. In July 2026, ZenBusiness and LegalZoom were nearly tied for second at 57.2% and 57.0%, with Bizee (Incfile) at 49.3%. By September 2026, the second tier had narrowed into a cluster of ZenBusiness at 50.8%, Bizee (Incfile) at 41.9%, and LegalZoom at 42.3%, with LegalZoom and Bizee (Incfile) now effectively tied for third.

Brand

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement

Sep 2026 rank

Northwest Registered Agent

64.5%

59.9%

Down 4.6 points

1st

ZenBusiness

57.2%

50.8%

Down 6.4 points

2nd

LegalZoom

57.0%

42.3%

Down 14.7 points

3rd

Bizee (Incfile)

49.3%

41.9%

Down 7.4 points

4th

Harbor Compliance

22.2%

13.7%

Down 8.5 points

5th

Rocket Lawyer

16.1%

8.3%

Down 7.8 points

6th

InCorp

16.1%

6.6%

Down 9.5 points

7th

CT Corporation

1.4%

0.4%

Down 1.0 point

8th

CSC (Corporation Service Company)

0.2%

0.4%

Up 0.2 points

9th

Registered Agents Inc

2.3%

0.4%

Down 1.9 points

10th

The September-to-September comparison table above masks an important distinction: LegalZoom's largest single-month decline happened in August 2026 (down 12.5 points), while its September movement was a smaller 2.2-point decline. The same pattern holds for InCorp (down 7.5 points in August, 2.0 points in September), Harbor Compliance (down 6.4 in August, 2.1 in September), and Rocket Lawyer (down 7.0 in August, 0.8 in September). The category's contraction was front-loaded into August, with September serving as a quieter continuation.

What Changed This Month

Northwest Registered Agent

Northwest Registered Agent's coverage eased 1.5 points from 61.4% in August 2026 to 59.9% in September 2026, and 4.6 points from 64.5% in July 2026. This movement stayed within its stable range. The brand remains the category leader with a 9.1-point gap over ZenBusiness.

The supporting signals point in opposite directions. Raw mention presence rose to 93.1% of qualified observations in September 2026, up 4.6 points from 88.5% in July 2026. But top-three recommendation rate eased to 51.0% from 56.8% over the same window, and rank-one rate held roughly steady at 24.2% versus 23.1%. Valid recommendation counts rose from 285 in July 2026 to 302 in September 2026 even as the coverage percentage edged down, reflecting the larger qualified denominator.

The distinction to notice is between presence and conversion. Northwest Registered Agent is surfaced more often than any other brand, appearing in 93.1% of qualified observations, yet its recommendation outcome share has drifted down from the July 2026 peak.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which answer formats or prompt families are surfacing Northwest Registered Agent without converting it into a recommendation, and is that drift concentrated on specific AI surfaces?

Bizee (Incfile)

Bizee (Incfile) posted the largest month-over-month movement in September 2026, with coverage down 4.7 points from 46.6% in August 2026 to 41.9%. That single-month shift was within its normal range, but the cumulative decline of 7.4 points from 49.3% in July 2026 qualifies as significant. Valid recommendation counts fell from 218 in July 2026 to 211 in September 2026 while the qualified denominator grew.

The erosion is concentrated in outcomes rather than visibility. Raw mention presence fell from 65.6% to 60.1% over the series, a 5.5-point decline within its normal range. Top-three recommendation rate dropped from 32.6% to 29.0%. By contrast, rank-one rate improved from 2.7% to 3.8% over the same window, and net sentiment eased from 0.8 to 0.7.

Bizee (Incfile) is winning a slightly larger share of first-place recommendations even as its overall coverage contracts, suggesting the decline is in breadth of recommendation rather than in top-of-list prominence.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which mid-tier queries stopped including Bizee (Incfile) in recommendation shortlists, and do the queries it still wins share a common attribute profile?

LegalZoom

LegalZoom's coverage fell 2.2 points from 44.5% in August 2026 to 42.3% in September 2026, a modest continuation of its 12.5-point August decline. The cumulative movement is the category's largest: down 14.7 points from 57.0% in July 2026, with valid recommendation counts falling from 252 to 213 over the series.

LegalZoom's raw mention presence remains high at 82.7% of qualified observations in September 2026, down from 85.3% in July 2026 but still the second-highest presence in the category. The decline is concentrated in outcomes: top-three rate eased from 17.6% to 16.7%, rank-one rate from 2.7% to 2.0%, and net sentiment dropped from 0.7 to 0.5.

The distinction between presence and recommendation is most visible for LegalZoom. It appears in roughly 8 of every 10 qualified observations but is recommended in fewer than half of them, a gap that has widened across the summer.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which high-intent prompt families shifted away from recommending LegalZoom during the July-to-September window, and which competitor now captures those recommendations?

InCorp

InCorp's coverage declined 2.0 points from 8.6% in August 2026 to 6.6% in September 2026, and 9.5 points from 16.1% in July 2026. The cumulative decline is significant, with valid recommendation counts falling from 71 in July 2026 to 41 in August 2026 and 33 in September 2026.

The supporting metrics show broad erosion. Raw mention presence fell from 26.9% to 15.7% over the series, an 11.2-point drop. Top-three recommendation rate fell from 7.9% to 3.2%, and rank-one rate from 1.8% to 0.6%. Net sentiment eased from 0.7 to 0.5.

InCorp's decline includes a genuine presence contraction, not just a recommendation outcome shift. The benchmark records the brand appearing less often overall and being recommended less frequently within the answers where it does appear.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Which queries previously surfaced InCorp and no longer do, and what evidence or source patterns changed in those answer contexts?

Harbor Compliance

Harbor Compliance declined 2.1 points from 15.8% in August 2026 to 13.7% in September 2026, and 8.5 points from 22.2% in July 2026. The cumulative decline is significant, with valid recommendation counts falling from 98 in July 2026 to 75 in August 2026 and 69 in September 2026.

Harbor Compliance's raw mention presence held relatively steady, moving from 36.4% in July 2026 to 35.1% in September 2026, a modest 1.3-point decline within its normal range. The sharper contraction came in top-three recommendation rate, which fell from 13.4% to 9.1%. Rank-one rate fell from 2.0% to 0.6%, and net sentiment dropped from 0.7 to 0.5.

Harbor Compliance remains visible in roughly a third of qualified observations but converts that presence into recommendations less often than in July 2026, with the conversion gap widening primarily in the top-three recommendation tier.

Highest-priority diagnostic: What changed in the recommendation logic where Harbor Compliance is mentioned but not shortlisted, and which attributes or competitor comparisons are driving the shift?

Registered Agents Inc and CT Corporation

Registered Agents Inc and CT Corporation both sit at 0.4% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, near the category floor. Registered Agents Inc declined 1.9 points from 2.3% in July 2026, a significant move on a small base: valid recommendations fell from 10 in July 2026 to 1 in August 2026 and 2 in September 2026. CT Corporation declined from 1.4% to 0.4% over the same window, with valid recommendations falling from 6 to 5 to 2.

Registered Agents Inc's raw mention presence fell from 5.9% to 2.6%, and its top-three rate from 1.8% to 0.4%. These are small-count movements where a shift of even a few observations produces large percentage changes. CT Corporation's presence fell from 4.1% to 1.6%, even as its coverage change stayed within its stable range.

The distinction to notice is fragility: both brands now operate so close to the floor that a single observation change can move their coverage percentage materially.

Highest-priority diagnostic: For Registered Agents Inc and CT Corporation, which remaining query contexts still generate any recommendation at all, and what would need to change for AI systems to recommend them beyond occasional observations?

Notable Gap: LegalZoom and the lower tier

The benchmark tracks a widening gap between LegalZoom and the category's smallest players, driven primarily by the lower tier's decline rather than by LegalZoom's movement. The gap between LegalZoom and CSC (Corporation Service Company) narrowed from 56.8 points in July 2026 to 41.9 points in September 2026, as did the gap between LegalZoom and CT Corporation, which narrowed from 55.6 to 41.9 points. The gap between LegalZoom and Registered Agents Inc narrowed from 54.7 to 41.9 points. These gaps narrowed every month across the series.

The category's spread compressed because the middle tier moved down toward the lower tier, not because the lower tier climbed. The lower tier's erosion means the gap between LegalZoom and the smallest brands is now the tightest it has been across the measured window.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Is the narrowing spread a temporary rebalancing or a longer-running pattern in how these AI surfaces structure registered agent recommendations, particularly as the lower tier approaches the floor?

Buyer-Intent Interpretation

Buyer-intent cluster

What it captures

Strategic question

Brand Recommendation

Queries where the buyer asks which registered agent service to use and expects a direct recommendation

Which brands are named first when an AI system recommends a provider?

Pricing & Value

Queries probing cost structures and value comparisons between providers

What do AI systems say about each brand's pricing position?

Multi-Brand Comparison

Queries asking AI to compare two or more providers head-to-head

When brands are compared, which one does the AI favor and why?

The qualified observations for September 2026 fell entirely into the brand recommendation cluster, which captured all 504 qualified observations across all ten tracked brands. The benchmark found no qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison clusters across any month in the July-through-September window.

This means the current benchmark cannot yet answer questions about how AI systems characterize relative pricing, value positioning, or head-to-head comparisons. Brands competing on price or seeking to win comparative evaluations will not see those dynamics reflected in this benchmark's public metrics, even as pricing-related answer types appear in the broader answer distribution.

Brand Opportunity Summary

Brand

Sep 2026 coverage

Current signal

Highest-priority diagnostic

Northwest Registered Agent

59.9%

Coverage leader; presence up 4.6 points to 93.1% but coverage down 4.6 points from July 2026

Which answer formats no longer convert the brand's near-universal presence into recommendations?

ZenBusiness

50.8%

Down 6.4 points from July 2026; top-three rate steady at 43.9%

Which surfaces show the strongest recommendation persistence for the brand?

LegalZoom

42.3%

Down 14.7 points from July 2026; presence high at 82.7% but conversion gap widened

Which high-intent prompt families shifted away from recommending the brand?

Bizee (Incfile)

41.9%

Largest single-month mover in September, down 4.7 points; rank-one rate up to 3.8%

Which mid-tier queries stopped including the brand in shortlists?

Harbor Compliance

13.7%

Down 8.5 points from July 2026; presence steady but top-three rate lower at 9.1%

What changed in answer contexts where the brand is mentioned but not shortlisted?

Rocket Lawyer

8.3%

Down 7.8 points from July 2026; valid recommendations fell from 71 to 42

Which query classes no longer surface the brand at all?

InCorp

6.6%

Down 9.5 points from July 2026; presence down 11.2 points alongside coverage

Which queries previously surfaced the brand and no longer do?

CT Corporation

0.4%

Stable; near category floor with 2 valid recommendations

Which remaining contexts still generate any recommendation for the brand?

CSC (Corporation Service Company)

0.4%

Stable; 2 valid recommendations in September 2026

Which niche queries continue to produce its occasional recommendations?

Registered Agents Inc

0.4%

Down 1.9 points from July 2026; 2 valid recommendations, down from 10

Which remaining query contexts still surface the brand at all?

The benchmark identifies where attention is warranted; a company-level analysis is needed to explain why.

Evidence Behind the Benchmark

The aggregate metrics are built from prompt-level observations (query, surface, recommendation outcome, rank, sentiment, and citations where exposed). Company-level analysis can go deeper into prompt, competitor, surface, and evidence patterns. Source presence is not automatically treated as proof of causation.

Report-Specific Interpretation Notes

  • Small-count movements matter: Registered Agents Inc, CSC (Corporation Service Company), and CT Corporation all operate near the floor of the category, where a shift of even a few observations produces large percentage changes.
  • The qualified denominator (504 observations in September 2026) differs from the raw collection universe (800 prompts), so brand-level recommendation percentages reflect only the qualified analysis set.
  • Directional analysis identifies changes worth investigating; month-over-month movement does not by itself establish cause.
  • Coverage, presence, rank, and sentiment are separate signals; a brand can be widely present but rarely recommended, as LegalZoom's September 2026 data shows.

About This Benchmark

This report is part of the LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery research program.

Next Step

The Public Benchmark Shows Where a Brand Is Winning or Losing. A Company-Level Audit Shows Why.

Beneath the aggregate percentages sit questions the public benchmark cannot answer: which high-intent prompts does a brand win, which competitor takes the recommendation when a brand loses, what attributes do AI systems associate with each option, and which external sources shape those answers. For a brand like LegalZoom, which lost 14.7 points of coverage since July 2026 while maintaining 82.7% presence, the commercial question is not whether it is visible but why AI systems stopped recommending it in qualifying answers.

A company-specific AI visibility audit maps those prompt, surface, competitor, ranking, sentiment, and evidence-source patterns into a prioritized visibility strategy.

Request an AI visibility audit

/ Take the next step

Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?

We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.

Measurable, Repeatable Programme

Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge

Citation Architecture Review

Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.

AI Visibility Audit

Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.

/ Learn More

Understanding AI search visibility.

AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.

What Is AI Citation Intelligence?
AI citation intelligence is the process of measuring where AI platforms source their information and how frequently a brand is mentioned or referenced in AI-generated responses. Because LLMs synthesize across multiple sources, the sites and brands that appear repeatedly tend to influence how a topic or company is framed. This practice focuses on identifying which sources shape AI outputs and tracking brand visibility across different AI systems.
What Is Citation Architecture?
Citation architecture describes the set of sources that consistently inform how AI systems talk about a brand, product, or topic. LLMs draw from websites, articles, forums, and public discussion, and the sources they rely on most often become the backbone of their answers. Building strong citation architecture means ensuring that accurate, credible, high authority sources are the ones most likely to shape the way AI tools summarize and recommend a brand.
What Is Generative Engine Optimization?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of improving the chances that AI systems use and cite your brand or content when generating answers. While traditional SEO is centered on ranking pages in search results, GEO focuses on how LLMs retrieve, interpret, and combine information when responding to a question. The objective is to strengthen the content and sources AI systems rely on, so your brand is treated as a trusted reference in AI responses.
What Is AI Share of Voice?
AI share of voice tracks how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers compared with competitors in the same category. It reflects visibility across AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Monitoring AI share of voice helps organizations see whether AI systems consistently include and recommend their brand for key queries or whether competitor brands are showing up more often.

About The Author

Mark Huntley

Mark Huntley

Founder and CEO

Mark Huntley, J.D. is founder of CiteWorks Studio, a strategic advisory focused on visibility, authority, and recommendation presence in AI-shaped search environments. His work centers on embedding-level GEO, vector optimization, and cosine gap engineering — helping brands align their digital presence with the retrieval systems that increasingly shape discovery, interpretation, and choice.

VIEW ALL CASE STUDIESREQUEST AN AI VISIBILITY AUDIT