How AI Search Is Recommending WordPress Web Hosting: Monthly Trends
This analysis is based on the source benchmark: WordPress Web Hosting: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
Key Takeaways
- Hostinger moved into first place at 83.0% recommendation coverage in September 2026, edging SiteGround at 82.0% after trailing in August.
- WP Engine posted the largest July-to-September gain, rising 14.4 points to 56.2%, while Cloudways and Kinsta also made strong baseline gains.
- Bluehost climbed to 67.2% and held third place, but its rank-one recommendation rate fell versus July, indicating broader visibility without stronger top placement.
- Flywheel was the only significant overall decliner, dropping to 3.5%, while Liquid Web also fell month over month and remained well behind the mid-tier group.
Executive Summary
Hostinger holds the largest share of AI recommendation coverage in WordPress Web Hosting for September 2026 at 83.0%, up 5.7 points from 77.3% in August 2026. SiteGround follows closely at 82.0% (up 1.5 points from 80.5%), leaving the two brands separated by a single point at the top of the category. The leadership pair has tightened, with Hostinger taking the top spot it did not hold in August.
The broader story is sustained baseline-to-current growth across the middle tier, with WP Engine posting the largest gain in the category and Bluehost also posting a significant one-month rise. Bluehost's coverage rose 6.8 points to 67.2% in September from 60.4% in August, extending a two-month climb of 6.9 points from 60.3% in July — a significant move both this month and against the baseline. WP Engine rose 3.2 points to 56.2% in September from 53.0% in August (not a significant one-month move), extending a two-month climb of 14.4 points from 41.8% in July, the largest baseline-to-current gain in the category. Kinsta posted a 4.5-point gain to 50.4% from 45.9% (also not significant month-over-month), extending an 11.8-point rise from 38.6% in July. All six brands classified as significant risers against the baseline — Bluehost, Cloudways, Hostinger, Kinsta, SiteGround, and WP Engine — gained ground from the July baseline to September.
At the other end, Flywheel and Liquid Web both posted significant one-month declines in September. Flywheel fell 4.8 points from 8.3% in August to 3.5%, the category's only significant decliner overall. Liquid Web fell 5.5 points from 16.6% to 11.1%, a significant one-month move, but its change against the July baseline remains within normal variation, keeping its overall classification stable. The gap between Flywheel and WP Engine widened every month from July to September, from 34.3 points to 52.7 points.
The category saw significant and mixed movement this month against a comparative baseline in July. Six brands were classified as significant risers, one as a significant decliner, and three remained stable across the July-to-September series.
Each monthly run begins with 800 prompt-surface observations (514 unique questions) across the benchmark's defined AI/search surface universe in September 2026. Of those, 800 mentioned a tracked brand or competitor; 771 were relevant and 29 were irrelevant. The public metrics use the 649 observations that survive both qualification stages. The July 2026 baseline included 600 prompt-surface observations (297 unique questions), of which 587 were relevant and 13 irrelevant, yielding 469 qualified observations. The August 2026 period included 800 prompt-surface observations (523 unique questions), of which 778 were relevant and 22 irrelevant, yielding 626 qualified observations.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Hostinger83.0%
- SiteGround82.0%
- Bluehost67.2%
- WP Engine56.2%
- Cloudways55.9%
- Kinsta50.4%
- DreamHost42.1%
- Liquid Web11.1%
- Flywheel3.5%
- GoDaddy3.4%
Key Findings
Signal | September 2026 finding |
|---|---|
Category leader | Hostinger leads at 83.0% valid recommendation coverage (75.7% in July 2026), up 7.3 points from baseline |
Strongest riser from baseline | WP Engine rose 14.4 points to 56.2% coverage (41.8% in July 2026), a significant move |
Second-strongest riser from baseline | Cloudways rose 13.5 points to 55.9% coverage (42.4% in July 2026), a significant move |
Sharpest decliner this month | Flywheel fell 4.8 points to 3.5% coverage (8.3% in August 2026), a significant move |
Leadership shift | Hostinger moved past SiteGround, 83.0% versus 82.0%, reversing their August standings |
Mid-tier consolidation | Kinsta, Cloudways, and WP Engine now hold coverage between 50.4% and 56.2%, above the 42.1% held by DreamHost |
Benchmark Context
The report separates the raw collection universe from the qualified analysis set. Brand-level recommendation percentages are calculated within the qualified benchmark set.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations collected | 600 | 800 | Total prompt-surface observations gathered across the AI/search surface universe |
Unique questions | 297 | 514 | Distinct questions represented in the collection |
Brand / competitor mentions | 600 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand or competitor |
Relevant prompts | 587 | 771 | Prompts deemed relevant to the category |
Irrelevant prompts | 13 | 29 | Prompts deemed irrelevant to the category |
Qualified benchmark observations | 469 | 649 | Observations surviving all qualification stages (public denominator) |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | AI surface families with at least one qualified observation (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode) |
The August 2026 period was the intermediate month in this series, with 800 prompt-surface observations, 523 unique questions, 626 qualified observations, and a qualified surface breadth of 6. With the qualification stages defined, the following benchmark-wide metrics summarize how the overall AI answer mix shifted between July and September before turning to individual brand standings.
Benchmark-Level Metrics
Metric | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified observations | 469 | 649 | +180 |
Companies tracked | 10 | 10 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 46.3% | 50.7% | Up 4.4 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 78.9% | 86.4% | Up 7.5 points |
Category leader by coverage | SiteGround (77.0%) | Hostinger (83.0%) | Leader changed |
The three-month series shows steady expansion in collection scope and a market shifting toward recommendation-shaped answers. The increase in qualified observations from 469 to 649 reflects more questions and prompts across the same six AI surface families, all of which remained active in every month of the series.
AI Recommendation Trend
The WordPress Web Hosting category shows a leadership handoff at the top and sustained gains across the middle tier. Hostinger now leads SiteGround by 1.0 point, a reversal of the August standings when SiteGround led by 3.2 points. Hostinger's valid recommendation coverage rose to 83.0% in September 2026 from 75.7% in July 2026, while SiteGround reached 82.0% from 77.0% over the same period. The two leaders sit just one point apart, with a broader field of risers closing in below them.
Valid Recommendation Coverage by Brand
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement | Sep 2026 rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluehost | 60.3 | 67.2 | Up 6.9 points | 3rd |
Cloudways | 42.4 | 55.9 | Up 13.5 points | 5th |
DreamHost | 43.5 | 42.1 | Down 1.4 points | 7th |
Flywheel | 7.5 | 3.5 | Down 4.0 points | 9th |
GoDaddy | 2.8 | 3.4 | Up 0.6 points | 10th |
Hostinger | 75.7 | 83.0 | Up 7.3 points | 1st |
Kinsta | 38.6 | 50.4 | Up 11.8 points | 6th |
Liquid Web | 13.9 | 11.1 | Down 2.8 points | 8th |
SiteGround | 77.0 | 82.0 | Up 5.0 points | 2nd |
WP Engine | 41.8 | 56.2 | Up 14.4 points | 4th |
The category-level change in September combined several significant movements. Six brands posted significant gains from the July baseline, one posted a significant decline, and the leadership position changed hands. The concentration of significant risers, rather than any single brand, drove the new competitive configuration.
What Changed This Month
Hostinger: Significant Rise Moves It Into the Lead
Hostinger's coverage rose 5.7 points to 83.0% in September 2026 from 77.3% in August, a significant move that completed a two-month climb of 7.3 points from 75.7% in July. The gain places Hostinger ahead of SiteGround, reversing their August standings.
The rise is anchored in broad strength across the quality metrics. Its top-three rate reached 66.9% in September, up from 56.5% in July, and its rank-one rate reached 54.7%, up from 43.7% in July. Raw mention presence reached 94.8%, up from 89.8% in July. Its valid recommendation count grew to 539 in September from 355 in July.
The distinction to notice: Hostinger gained both presence and placement quality across the period. The category leader is not merely being mentioned more often; it is being recommended in the top position more than half the time.
Highest-priority diagnostic: Which evidence sources and prompt categories are reinforcing Hostinger's rank-one position, and how durable is that advantage across all six AI surfaces?
SiteGround: Significant Rise, But a Leadership Handoff
SiteGround's coverage rose 1.5 points to 82.0% in September 2026 from 80.5% in August, a non-significant prior-month move that still completes a significant 5.0-point climb from 77.0% in July. The brand held the category lead in both July and August before Hostinger moved past it in September.
SiteGround's raw mention presence reached 93.8%, near-universal, while its top-three rate reached 53.9%, up from 49.0% in July. Its rank-one rate stood at 9.7%, down from 13.0% in July. Its valid recommendation count grew to 532 in September from 361 in July.
The distinction to notice: SiteGround's near-universal presence and strong top-three placement are intact, but its rank-one rate has slipped since July while Hostinger's has climbed. The leadership handoff is driven by the top position, not by overall presence.
Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompts are now giving the rank-one recommendation to Hostinger instead of SiteGround, and what evidence sources support that shift?
WP Engine: Strongest Baseline-to-Current Riser
WP Engine's coverage rose 3.2 points to 56.2% in September 2026 from 53.0% in August, a non-significant prior-month move that caps a two-month climb of 14.4 points from 41.8% in July, the largest baseline-to-current gain in the category. The brand moved from 5th in August to 4th in September.
Its raw mention presence reached 66.4%, up from 56.7% in July. Within that expanded presence, its top-three rate dipped to 10.0% from 11.3% in July, and its rank-one rate fell to 1.5% from 2.8% in July, both non-significant. Valid recommendation count grew to 365 in September from 196 in July.
The distinction to notice: WP Engine's rise came from broader coverage and presence, not from improved placement at the top. The brand is winning more recommendation shortlist slots, but its position within those shortlists has not strengthened.
Highest-priority diagnostic: Which surface or prompt type is driving WP Engine's coverage expansion, and why is that expansion not translating into stronger top-three placement?
Bluehost: Significant Rise in Coverage, Weaker Rank-One Rate
Bluehost's coverage rose 6.8 points to 67.2% in September 2026 from 60.4% in August, a significant move that extends a two-month climb of 6.9 points from 60.3% in July. The brand holds the clear third position behind the two leaders.
Its top-three rate reached 38.1% in September, up from 29.2% in July, while its rank-one rate fell to 4.9%, down from 8.1% in July — a significant baseline-to-current decline. Raw mention presence dipped 1.8 points to 81.4% from 83.2% in July, and valid recommendation count grew to 436 in September from 283 in July.
The distinction to notice: Bluehost is being recommended in top-three positions more often, but its rank-one rate has fallen significantly since July. The brand is consolidating its position just below the leaders while losing its share of top recommendations.
Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompts previously gave Bluehost the rank-one recommendation, and which competitor is now taking that top spot?
Flywheel: The Significant Decliner
Flywheel's coverage fell 4.8 points to 3.5% in September 2026 from 8.3% in August, a significant move that reverses its modest August gain. The brand now sits at its lowest point in the series, down 4.0 points from 7.5% in July.
Its raw mention presence dropped sharply to 5.5% in September from 13.0% in July, a 7.5-point decline. Its top-three rate fell to 0.9%, and its rank-one rate remained at 0.0%. Valid recommendation count fell to 23 in September from 35 in July.
The distinction to notice: Flywheel's decline is a presence problem, not a placement problem. The brand is appearing in fewer observations altogether, and the small counts mean its percentage movements should be read with caution.
Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompts are no longer surfacing Flywheel at all, and which competitors are capturing its former mention share?
Liquid Web: Significant Prior-Month Decline
Liquid Web's coverage fell 5.5 points to 11.1% in September 2026 from 16.6% in August, a significant move that leaves the brand below its July level of 13.9%. Its raw mention presence also fell to 15.2% from 18.8% in July.
Its top-three rate slipped to 1.2%, and its rank-one rate declined to a near-zero 0.2%. Valid recommendation count reached 72 in September, up from 65 in July, even as its coverage rate declined against a larger qualified denominator this period.
The distinction to notice: Liquid Web's rate decline is a retreat from the modest gains it posted in August, even though its underlying recommendation count held roughly steady from the July baseline. The gap between Liquid Web and WP Engine widened every month from July to September.
Highest-priority diagnostic: Which prompt categories are no longer producing recommendations for Liquid Web, and is the decline concentrated on a particular AI surface?
Buyer-Intent Interpretation
Buyer-intent cluster | What it captures | Strategic question |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | Prompts seeking a specific hosting brand as the answer | Which brands do AI systems recommend when a clear recommendation is requested? |
Pricing & Value | Prompts focused on cost, pricing plans, and value comparisons | What does the benchmark reveal about how AI systems frame pricing and value? |
Multi-Brand Comparison | Prompts asking for direct comparison between two or more brands | How do AI systems structure head-to-head comparisons? |
In July, August, and September 2026, the qualified observations fell entirely into the Brand Recommendation cluster. No observations were recorded in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison clusters for any month.
This means the public benchmark for WordPress Web Hosting currently tracks which brands AI systems surface when a direct recommendation is requested, and it is a robust signal for that question. The benchmark cannot yet answer commercial questions about how AI systems frame pricing, value, or head-to-head trade-offs. Those questions require a different analysis lens than the current public observation set.
Brand Opportunity Summary
Brand | Sep 2026 coverage | Current signal | Highest-priority diagnostic |
|---|---|---|---|
Bluehost | 67.2% | Significant rise, rank-one rate down | Which prompts shifted away from rank-one recommendations? |
Cloudways | 55.9% | Significant rise from baseline, stable this month | Which prompts drove the sustained coverage expansion? |
DreamHost | 42.1% | Stable, flat across the series | What holds it below the rising mid-tier brands? |
Flywheel | 3.5% | Significant decline, lowest in series | Which prompts stopped surfacing the brand altogether? |
GoDaddy | 3.4% | Stable, low coverage | Which use cases earn it a recommendation at all? |
Hostinger | 83.0% | Category leader, significant rise, strong rank-one | How durable is the top position across all surfaces? |
Kinsta | 50.4% | Significant rise from baseline, crossed 50% | Which prompts drove the sustained coverage growth? |
Liquid Web | 11.1% | Significant prior-month decline | Which surfaces or prompts drove the retreat? |
SiteGround | 82.0% | Significant rise, leadership handoff | Why is the rank-one rate slipping while presence stays high? |
WP Engine | 56.2% | Strongest baseline-to-current rise | Why is coverage growth not improving top-three placement? |
The benchmark identifies where attention is warranted; a company-level analysis is needed to explain why.
Evidence Behind the Benchmark
The aggregate metrics are built from prompt-level observations (query, surface, recommendation outcome, rank, sentiment, and citations where exposed). Company-level analysis can go deeper into prompt, competitor, surface, and evidence patterns. Source presence is not automatically treated as proof of causation.
Report-Specific Interpretation Notes
- Small-count movement: Some brands, such as Flywheel, GoDaddy, and Liquid Web, operate on small absolute counts of valid recommendations (23, 22, and 72 respectively in September 2026). Their percentage movements should be read with that context in mind.
- Qualified denominator vs raw collection: Brand-level percentages are calculated against the qualified benchmark set (649 observations in September), not the larger raw collection (800 prompts). This ensures comparability across months and surfaces.
- Directional analysis: Month-over-month movement identifies changes worth investigating. It does not by itself establish the cause of those changes.
This report is part of the LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery research program. See the AI Industry Market Discovery overview, methodology, metrics, and standards pages for more on how this benchmark is built.
Next Step
The Public Benchmark Shows Where a Brand Is Winning or Losing. A Company-Level Audit Shows Why.
The aggregate coverage percentage for each brand in September 2026 answers a narrow but critical question: how often do AI systems recommend this brand in WordPress Web Hosting prompts? Beneath that percentage sit the questions that determine the next move: Which high-intent prompts is the brand winning? When a recommendation goes to a competitor, which one? What attributes do AI systems associate with each option? Which external sources are shaping those answers?
A company-specific AI visibility audit maps those prompt, surface, competitor, ranking, sentiment, and evidence-source patterns into a prioritized visibility strategy. It moves from the benchmark's "what" to the actionable "why," identifying the specific levers that can change a brand's position in the AI recommendation landscape.
/ Take the next step
Want to Understand Your AI Citation Footprint?
We start every engagement with a full audit of how AI systems reference your brand today.
Measurable, Repeatable Programme
Build a durable foundation of credible citations that compounds over time and continues to influence AI answers as new queries emerge
Citation Architecture Review
Identify which high-authority community sources are and aren't working in your favour across AI platforms.
AI Visibility Audit
Understand exactly how LLMs are referencing your brand today and which sources are shaping those answers.
/ Learn More
Understanding AI search visibility.
AI search experiences create answers by pulling information from many places online and summarizing it into a single response.


